Honda/Acura Tech Honda tech discussion.

Really odd dyno numbers..Discussion...

Thread Tools
 
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

oo dam lol i just really looked at the numbers
something wrong there...break in period not done right maybe?
__________________


Old May 10, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleepinsol
I would tend to say that tose cams are bleeding off too much compression from that tiny little motor. those pistons put it at around 10.5:1 ratio with that head. those cams are reletively large on the exhaust side, and are designed for minimal crossover road race profiles. down low, the b16 doesnt move a ton of air to begin with, and at the compression it has the large primary lobes could possibly be too much for that motor to handle. once it gets into the high end on the graph the power seems to build nicely and carry very far. I would think some ctr pistions in there, and possibly some head work may help that motor a lot! thats just my theory tho.

+2
__________________


Old May 10, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #23 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleepinsol
I would tend to say that tose cams are bleeding off too much compression from that tiny little motor. those pistons put it at around 10.5:1 ratio with that head. those cams are reletively large on the exhaust side, and are designed for minimal crossover road race profiles. down low, the b16 doesnt move a ton of air to begin with, and at the compression it has the large primary lobes could possibly be too much for that motor to handle. once it gets into the high end on the graph the power seems to build nicely and carry very far. I would think some ctr pistions in there, and possibly some head work may help that motor a lot! thats just my theory tho.
That's exactly what i was thinking, not enough compression for those cams and the head isn't flowing right. Still weird though.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #24 (permalink)  
sleepinsol's Avatar
starting over
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paulino
Join the fun Danny boy!
you saw me lurking lol. i was typing as you posted.
__________________




RIP PABLO AKA FATHEAD.....YOU WILL BE MISSED!
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #25 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paulino
He made 98 ft-lbs. That's retarded.
thats like single cam tq
__________________


Old May 10, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #26 (permalink)  
Drivermod03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleepinsol
I would tend to say that tose cams are bleeding off too much compression from that tiny little motor. those pistons put it at around 10.5:1 ratio with that head. those cams are reletively large on the exhaust side, and are designed for minimal crossover road race profiles. down low, the b16 doesnt move a ton of air to begin with, and at the compression it has the large primary lobes could possibly be too much for that motor to handle. once it gets into the high end on the graph the power seems to build nicely and carry very far. I would think some ctr pistions in there, and possibly some head work may help that motor a lot! thats just my theory tho.
I agree 100%.Pretty much what I was saying..Just said better
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #27 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleepinsol
you saw me lurking lol. i was typing as you posted.
I figured and yep
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #28 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ls_[eg]hatch
thats like single cam tq
Exactly.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #29 (permalink)  
Drivermod03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paulino
I guess Vega just hyped the guy up.
Vega's a good tuner I hear so I dunno...But Ive never seen 190hp with that little of mods.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #30 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paulino
Exactly.

__________________





All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 AM.