Honda/Acura Tech Honda tech discussion.

Really odd dyno numbers..Discussion...

Thread Tools
 
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Join the fun Danny boy!
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

its cause its still a 1.6 bottom end...seems right to me.
b16s dont make 165wheel stock more like crank lol
__________________



Last edited by Ls_[eg]hatch; May 10, 2009 at 09:19 PM.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
mighty_mouse12's Avatar
MUSTANG NAZI!
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Default

There Might Be Something Seriously Wrong With His Bottom End But Those Numbers Are Not Like Stock.
__________________
OLD SCHOOL EF CREW MEMBER #100

Old May 10, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ls_[eg]hatch
its cause its still a 1.6 bottom end...seems right to me.
b16s dont make 165wheel stock more like crank lol
Stock B16's with higher compression than stock should make more power/torque than stock. It doesn't make sense.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
Drivermod03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,161
Likes: 0
Default

190? No way. I helped a friend build a high compression type-r with a laundry list of good mods and it made 195.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mighty_mouse12
There Might Be Something Seriously Wrong With His Bottom End But Those Numbers Are Not Like Stock.
+2
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
Ls_[eg]hatch's Avatar
mowchowbrowncow
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,368
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Paulino
Stock B16's with higher compression than stock should make more power/torque than stock. It doesn't make sense.

stock b16 will put down like 135-140 wheel n like 111fptq so 20whp from a set of cams is pretty good
__________________


Old May 10, 2009 | 09:23 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Drivermod03
190? No way. I helped a friend build a high compression type-r with a laundry list of good mods and it made 195.
I guess Vega just hyped the guy up.
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #19 (permalink)  
sleepinsol's Avatar
starting over
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 0
Default

I would tend to say that tose cams are bleeding off too much compression from that tiny little motor. those pistons put it at around 10.5:1 ratio with that head. those cams are reletively large on the exhaust side, and are designed for minimal crossover road race profiles. down low, the b16 doesnt move a ton of air to begin with, and at the compression it has the large primary lobes could possibly be too much for that motor to handle. once it gets into the high end on the graph the power seems to build nicely and carry very far. I would think some ctr pistions in there, and possibly some head work may help that motor a lot! thats just my theory tho.
__________________




RIP PABLO AKA FATHEAD.....YOU WILL BE MISSED!
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #20 (permalink)  
Paulino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not harsh, just truthful
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,709
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ls_[eg]hatch
stock b16 will put down like 135-140 wheel n like 111fptq so 20whp from a set of cams is pretty good
You still don't get it. He made 98 ft-lbs. That's retarded.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM.