Engine Management!
Your car are not programable? LOL
__________________
Debian Dog
2001 Trans-Am - A4 w/2.73 Steel Driveshaft - Full weight
2004 SRT-4 - MPx, PSI intake
Best Times 1/4
N/A - 12.56@110.51
N2O - 11.43@123.15 100 shot
See My Cars - Listen to the 224/228 closed & open - My Latest Video of Drag Run
Debian Dog

2001 Trans-Am - A4 w/2.73 Steel Driveshaft - Full weight
2004 SRT-4 - MPx, PSI intake
Best Times 1/4
N/A - 12.56@110.51
N2O - 11.43@123.15 100 shot
See My Cars - Listen to the 224/228 closed & open - My Latest Video of Drag Run
Originally posted by moldyhands
Show me an 11 second import that only has a few thousand in it, and I'll show you a car owner that's always talking about when his car's going to get fixed and what broke.
Show me an 11 second import that only has a few thousand in it, and I'll show you a car owner that's always talking about when his car's going to get fixed and what broke.
Guest
Posts: n/a
If cost isn't an issue, the AEM. If it were me, Megasquirt. Some of the AEM units have had reliability issues. If you have one, you have to send the unit back to them for repair or replacement. If you build a Megasquirt and there is a hardware issue, you dig into your spare parts bin and fix it. The MS is very well supported and documented on the internet, and its cheap. I could build and throw away 10 Megasquirts for the cost of one AEM.
Megasquirt only costs $120? I know if you look around for a little bit you can get an AEM Used with all the sensors and so forth for around $1200 and thats for a DSM PnP. From what I have seen it's even cheaper for other more popular applications.
I do get the point you are getting at fordified. For some reason the megasquirt just doesnt compare when it comes to tuning abilities to me.
For those looking into the megasquirt...
http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html
My train of thought is when I have so much money spent on a nice fast setup, why go on the cheap end when it comes to controling the whole thing. To me using a megasquirt on a race car is like putting snow tires on a 9second race car.
I do get the point you are getting at fordified. For some reason the megasquirt just doesnt compare when it comes to tuning abilities to me.
For those looking into the megasquirt...
http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html
My train of thought is when I have so much money spent on a nice fast setup, why go on the cheap end when it comes to controling the whole thing. To me using a megasquirt on a race car is like putting snow tires on a 9second race car.
Last edited by Ian MMF; Dec 28, 2004 at 06:57 AM.
This is true that's why it's not really fare to compare. To me the megasquirt looks like a computer controled VPC and that's about it. It's kind of hard to compare the two when it comes to that stuff just because the aem ems is more advanced, has more research behind it, bigger user base and is capable of alot more.
http://www.megasquirt.info/index.html
Main link for megasquirt also.
After looking through the megasquirt sight somewhat it seems that the megasquirt doesn't even have a timing control unit. Plus the fact that it doesnt have knock control like the aem ems does for pussies like me. Also not sure how many ports it has for controling stuff like meth injection, nitrous(even dual stages) and so forth.
http://www.megasquirt.info/index.html
Main link for megasquirt also.
After looking through the megasquirt sight somewhat it seems that the megasquirt doesn't even have a timing control unit. Plus the fact that it doesnt have knock control like the aem ems does for pussies like me. Also not sure how many ports it has for controling stuff like meth injection, nitrous(even dual stages) and so forth.
Last edited by Ian MMF; Dec 28, 2004 at 07:02 AM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The basic MS doesn't have much flexibility, but there are hardware and software add-ons that make it quite a versatile units. Marksaccord had an MS on his Corolla that used Ford EDIS coil packs and ignition controls. That whole setup with all parts was less than $250. There are additional hacks for extra inputs and outputs. Its open source so there are TONS of small projects to do various things.
No knock sensor? If you are worried about a knock sensor, and think it will help the life of your motor, you don't need a programmable system.
No knock sensor? If you are worried about a knock sensor, and think it will help the life of your motor, you don't need a programmable system.
Knock sensors do come in handy at times so for me it's better to be over safe then ever sorry.
I understand about the versitility but lack of flexibility with the MS. For me it's just that the aem ems can do so much more and offer more control, is proven and money wasn't a factor so it's the right choice for me.
BTW - CFT has aem ems for sale at like $1200 right now brand new and microtechs at like $800. Incase you are looking to buy soon slash.
I'm hoping boostjunkie will jump in here when he see's this since he has alot more hands on experience and a wider range of stand alones he has worked with so he can give better information then me since im still in the very early stages of stand alones and capabilities and so forth when comparing.
I understand about the versitility but lack of flexibility with the MS. For me it's just that the aem ems can do so much more and offer more control, is proven and money wasn't a factor so it's the right choice for me.
BTW - CFT has aem ems for sale at like $1200 right now brand new and microtechs at like $800. Incase you are looking to buy soon slash.
I'm hoping boostjunkie will jump in here when he see's this since he has alot more hands on experience and a wider range of stand alones he has worked with so he can give better information then me since im still in the very early stages of stand alones and capabilities and so forth when comparing.
Last edited by Ian MMF; Dec 28, 2004 at 07:14 AM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
F0|2 3453 0f 1|\|574ll4710|\|, plug 4|\|d pl4y 15 |234lly 70ugh 70 b347. 43M h45 1005 0f b453m4p5 f0|2 |\|34|2ly 3v3|2y 1|\|j3c70|2 4|\|d 3|\|g1|\|3 c0mb1|\|4710|\| 7h3y h4v3 73573d. \^/h3|\| 1 54y b453 m4p5, 1 m34|\|, 7h3y |\|33d m1|\|0|2 7u|\|1|\|g - u5u4lly l355 7h4|\| 4 c0upl3 pull5 0|\| \^/07 0|\| 7h3 dy|\|0 15 4ll 17 74k35 70 h4v3 17 z3|20'd 1|\| 100% (455um1|\|g m3ch4|\|1c4l d1ff1c13|\|c135 d0 |\|07 3><157).
Y35, 7h3|23 4|23 ch34p3|2 0p710|\|5, bu7 f0|2 7h3 4v3|24g3 j03 \^/h0 d035 |\|07 \^/4|\|7 70 5p3|\|d h0u|25 up0|\| h0u|25 |23\^/1|21|\|g h15 c4|2, 43M P|\|P 4pp5 4|23 |234lly 70ugh 70 b347. Plu5 1|\|73|2|\|4l d474l0gg1|\|g, 37c 37c 7h47 07h3|25 51mply d0 |\|07 0ff3|2.
1|\| 7h3 h0|\|d4 \^/0|2ld, 0f c0u|253 (c0ugh*|20|\|*) 7h3|23 4|23 0p710|\|5 5uch 45 |23p|20g|24mm1|\|g 7h3 570ck 3cu'5 4|\|d H0|\|d474 \^/h1ch m4k3 43M |247h3|2 3><071c f0|2 m057 4ppl1c4710|\|5, bu7 f0|2 |\|34|2ly 3v3|2y7h1|\|g 3l53 1'd 74k3 43M. 4|\|d |\|0 |20|\|, 7h15 15 |\|07 7h3 f1|257 71m3 1'v3 541d 17, |234d b4ck 7h|20ugh my p0575
Y35, 7h3|23 4|23 ch34p3|2 0p710|\|5, bu7 f0|2 7h3 4v3|24g3 j03 \^/h0 d035 |\|07 \^/4|\|7 70 5p3|\|d h0u|25 up0|\| h0u|25 |23\^/1|21|\|g h15 c4|2, 43M P|\|P 4pp5 4|23 |234lly 70ugh 70 b347. Plu5 1|\|73|2|\|4l d474l0gg1|\|g, 37c 37c 7h47 07h3|25 51mply d0 |\|07 0ff3|2.
1|\| 7h3 h0|\|d4 \^/0|2ld, 0f c0u|253 (c0ugh*|20|\|*) 7h3|23 4|23 0p710|\|5 5uch 45 |23p|20g|24mm1|\|g 7h3 570ck 3cu'5 4|\|d H0|\|d474 \^/h1ch m4k3 43M |247h3|2 3><071c f0|2 m057 4ppl1c4710|\|5, bu7 f0|2 |\|34|2ly 3v3|2y7h1|\|g 3l53 1'd 74k3 43M. 4|\|d |\|0 |20|\|, 7h15 15 |\|07 7h3 f1|257 71m3 1'v3 541d 17, |234d b4ck 7h|20ugh my p0575
It really depeonds on a quite a few factors. Do you need knock control? Do you need many additional outputs to control ntirous, IAC (idle control), etc, etc. Do you need the advanced logging capabilities of some? Closed loop operation for cruising? Or is this going on a race car that is seeing straight line and WOT only? Wideband integration?
Your choice in engine management varies depending on the answer to questions like that and many more.
Once you decide what you want, making the choice based on a feature set is trivial. There is no best engine management out there, at the core all they control is injector operation and timing. Its up to you to decide if you need/want the bells and whistles.
Another deciding factor is that you do not want to be running an esoteric engine management that is not widely used by the racing community. When you run into a problem its good to be able to ask others with similar setups to see if they have been through the same trials and tribulations. Trust me, you do NOT want to be R&Ding an EMS on your car unless you like wasting money.
I have tuned stock ECUs, AFCs, VPCs, Haltechs, AEMs, Microtechs... they are all similar once you get the concepts down. For a full street car needing to maintain AC, knock control for shitty gas, advanced logging, wideband integration, closed loop tuning for AFR, and the ease of plug and play..I would go with an AEM. Race car, straight line, good gas all the time, Haltech is nice and cheap. All my cars will run an AEM, because I build full street cars that idle, kick ass, and that actually drive on the street frequently. So it fits my needs very well.
EDIT: I will say though, that short of a MOTEC, *none* of the EMSs I have tuned have even close to the same logging capabilities of the AEM. In that regard, the AEM wins hands down.
Your choice in engine management varies depending on the answer to questions like that and many more.
Once you decide what you want, making the choice based on a feature set is trivial. There is no best engine management out there, at the core all they control is injector operation and timing. Its up to you to decide if you need/want the bells and whistles.
Another deciding factor is that you do not want to be running an esoteric engine management that is not widely used by the racing community. When you run into a problem its good to be able to ask others with similar setups to see if they have been through the same trials and tribulations. Trust me, you do NOT want to be R&Ding an EMS on your car unless you like wasting money.
I have tuned stock ECUs, AFCs, VPCs, Haltechs, AEMs, Microtechs... they are all similar once you get the concepts down. For a full street car needing to maintain AC, knock control for shitty gas, advanced logging, wideband integration, closed loop tuning for AFR, and the ease of plug and play..I would go with an AEM. Race car, straight line, good gas all the time, Haltech is nice and cheap. All my cars will run an AEM, because I build full street cars that idle, kick ass, and that actually drive on the street frequently. So it fits my needs very well.
EDIT: I will say though, that short of a MOTEC, *none* of the EMSs I have tuned have even close to the same logging capabilities of the AEM. In that regard, the AEM wins hands down.
Last edited by BOOST JUNKIE; Dec 28, 2004 at 09:51 AM.


