You cant compare a 347 8.2 deck to a 351 9.5 deck. The characteristics are similar by cu. in. number numerically and thats about it.

 

thats bullshit.he was saying that a t67mm was to small on a 351w yet i have seen them on first gen lighting turcks and a few 347 and made alots of power.we are talking cubic inch here not how tall the deck is.so you are saying because its 9.5 deck vs 8.2 deck that the turbo is to small?

 

If you think there anywhere near the same....your lacking basic knowledge

 

If your so right and were so wrong, post your combo and see what they say.

NEWBIE tech forum

john

 

Someone has filled your head with that. They are clueless too

 

explain how they are not the same? i know the 351w will handle more power.but if you take a 347 and a 351 with the same part its not going to make a diffrence just because the deck height

 

who cares what people say if i post it.hell you went from a 302 to a 363 and lost 50+ hp so bigger does not mean better

 

Because my turbo was to SMALL and remember it was a 363 with a 70mm/.96 ar.

 

so explain how a 347 makes a shit load of power with a t67 but a 351w wont.i dont see the diffrence in the 2

 

It all stems from there..how much does .250 in stroke, change a motor? How much does .556 in rod length, change a motor? Thats the difference in a 347 and a stock 351w.