The .81 is small but it works for your setup better than your 67mm. If you had a 72mm with a .81ar, i think you would be happy. If you watch over at TheTurboForums you will find new MP 's cheap from the vendors. Start a thread over there and ask about your combo, see what they tell you.

Build what you want, i just gave my .02 from the start and i hate to see people go through what i went through, shits not cheap. I truly do not care what your car runs or what it makes for power. Stop bringing my name up when someone tells you something you don't like about turbos here. I had a fast car with a turbo and i'm building a faster twin turbo car now, that's all.

john

 

i dont bring your name up.i simpley asked you a question in the other post.

 

"you shut up little bitch boy.go suck some more of johns nuts.i understand i have more cubic inch but im asking him why he thinks mine was to small but hes is ok.i understand my motor is bigger but so is my A/R so thats why i was asking him.i think you need to go back and read what i was asking.no one is here trying to cause drama it was a simple question for john not you."

john

 

that was not talking to you.if you read it.it says i was asking john a question.....

 

WHAT???

I guess i just don't understand your OBSESSION dicks and nuts. But who am i to judge, to each their own.

john

 

hes the one all over your nuts.this guy dont know shit.he always jumps on peoples nuts just because he think they know what they are talking about.on every forum you have a few people that dont know shit about cars and they are always jumping on peoples nuts.

 

Hell Im clueless, I had a 67 on a V6. Again, dyno #'s dont impress anyone that has a clue, show me some timeslips. I can guarantee you, no matter what tires you have on it, it will be a horrible street car. The boost will come on so fast, you wont be able to plant to the ground with the best suspension, again spinning tires was cool at 16-17. Did you ever think thats why they put that set-up in a 6,000 pound truck...to get that mass moving.

 

im not worried about it hooking up.my last 94gt everyone said it wont hook.i have time slips it went 10.6 @ 128 with a 1.43 60ft....i know its going to spool up quick.thats fine means no lag at all.plus the mickey thompson i have 275.60/15 will be fine on the street.

 

I ran the same turbo / tire on a V6 with all BMR suspension. I not knocking you bro, and take it for what its worth, neither was John. Just giving some feedback and advice and 1st hand experience, not some random thread someone has posted. The man is knowledgeable and has had different set-ups and was offering good info. He's not a personal friend (dont think thats why Im defending him), but have bought parts from him and asked questions myself and is always willing to share experienced answers. Good to have people that is willing to share info / advice when help is needed.

 

i understand that and i dont mind someone giving some input.as for him building a turbo car if i remember right he said that was his first build.i was saying a while back i have even seen a t67 on a 347 and everyone was trying to tell me its not the same a my 351...as for cubic inch is almost the same so if i have seen it on a 347 make 550+ easy why cant my 351.then he said it will make it but not last because it will be at its max.maybe im wrong but a 347 with almost the same shit i have with 12lb boost made 625 or something like that without a tune.so i dont see how it will be at its max....hell i even had people saying the holley systemax wont fit on a 351w and i already proved that wrong just because someone says it wont work does not mean they are right..some of the same people saying the t67 is to small are the same people that said the holley systemax wont work