200whp NA < 260whp turbo.
I don't think it'll even be close...Remember the turbo engine will make more torque and has 60whp over the N/A engine.

 

honestly i think the turbo will take the n/a in that car..its a pretty heavy teg...the 135lb tq in the na just wont cut the 200+lb tq in the ls..and 260whp..cuz the na in that car wouldnt jump..say like a crx lsvtec 200whp..hehe

 

To everyone who thinks OMFG TURBO!!!! is wrong, there are PLENTY of NA car beating turbo'd ones, here's an example....

LS turbo(good driver) and B16 NA(good driver)

YouTube - Outkast LS Turbo vs Hatchback 2

 

but in all honesty i would stick with the LS turbo just because if something happends it's cheaper and easier to fix and more reliable than all motor

 

slow down there teggy..idont think turbo omfg..ive beaten a lot of turbo cars with my all motor car..im just saying..for money ease and power..turbo would be better IMO for his car..i dont think a all motor 200whp teg..would be a 260+ whp teg..thats turbo..so calm down..dont think some bs of me bcuz of a statement..read it clearly..

 

also u provided a vid of a turbo teg..vs all motor hatch..with a nice weight advantage..and im sure different trannys..ls-t most likely havin a ls tranny and a b16 with a short geared b16 tranny..that makes a bit of difference..

 

I was not stating only you but in general. The video was to prove NA CAN beat Turbo...

 

im just sayin since u quoted me..that u were pointin a finger at me cuz im not sayin turbo is better always..like i mentioned ive beaten turbo civics lancer evos 93 turbo supra(stock) i know its possible but for him..i think the ls-t will be faster then the lsvtec..imo..

 

Yepp yepp. Where in LOL do you live?

 

down the road between abc pizza and chevron on 41