New Shelby GT500
know most people here don't like car and driver, but they just did a comparison of the two and the c6 came out on top for all the reasons listed by most of the people in this post. price, weight, handling and speed. they said it was a nice street car, but they were a bit disappointed with the acceleration, like it was lacking about 100hp from the manufacturers claim.
Originally Posted by LC2nLS6
Um, not worry about a supercharged LS2 C6 with supporting mods? The point is that the GT500 has to be superchargd just to hang with a C6. By supercharging the C6 the 3900# Mustang should not be able to keep up for the money spent.
BTW- I'm not worried about a pullied/tuned GT500 in my V6 powered '87 Regal either
BTW- I'm not worried about a pullied/tuned GT500 in my V6 powered '87 Regal either

Everyone keeps talking bad about this car yet it is faster then almost everyone who has done so....
__________________


Originally Posted by Road Rage
apples to oranges, the mustang has a smaller motor and two more seats....
Everyone keeps talking bad about this car yet it is faster then almost everyone who has done so....
Everyone keeps talking bad about this car yet it is faster then almost everyone who has done so....
__________________
D-1SC procharger f/s $2500 with injectors and TPIS fuel rail, <1000miles
AIM:gsxrpat76

D-1SC procharger f/s $2500 with injectors and TPIS fuel rail, <1000miles
AIM:gsxrpat76

Originally Posted by Charles
and I'm saying when you price it at 42k it better compete with em' 
__________________
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
I did the best I could on the scans but its not too good. and the images were resized once I uploaded them.




edit, yup the pictures are unreadable do to the photobucket resize. anyone know how I could get them on here without them being resized???




edit, yup the pictures are unreadable do to the photobucket resize. anyone know how I could get them on here without them being resized???
__________________
Last edited by Puto; Jun 7, 2006 at 08:05 PM.
Originally Posted by Road Rage
apples to oranges, the mustang has a smaller motor and two more seats....
Everyone keeps talking bad about this car yet it is faster then almost everyone who has done so....
Everyone keeps talking bad about this car yet it is faster then almost everyone who has done so....
The Mustang has a smaller engine than the vette? OK- not smaller than my 3.8L Buick V6 and both my Z06 and Buick are quicker. The Buick also has a back seat, full interior, cold a/c, tunes, 18 mpg and runs 10's @ 125+ mph weighing 3350#'s. Not bad for an 87 Regal with the aero of a cinder block
I'll be at BMP tomorrow night on pump gas, and 18 psi boost with a 16.5 degree conservative street chip.
__________________
I sure wish the new Mustangs would go on a diet. They are the best looking car you can buy for under 50K and I'd love to see a fleet of them going through some turns.
__________________
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
I'm not a domestic guy but I would definately put my money on the C6. I saw this thing on speed channel last month about them. New vettes are sick! Those dimensions someone listed about the GT500 are god awful. Will surpass 2 tons with a driver in it!
__________________

1992 GTS 3sgte from hell! // 1990 GT liftback Stock 3sgte

1992 GTS 3sgte from hell! // 1990 GT liftback Stock 3sgte
Ford does have to put the car on a diet, but given the fact that they'll sell all of them as they sit i doubt it will happen. I believe this has the iron block in it doesn't it? if they would've used the aluminum block you're looking at at least a 100lb savings..
__________________
I am your penalty.....
I am your penalty.....


