Greatest car of the nineties?
95 was the last year MR2's were imported to the US with the "cool" tail lights etc .
Body colored moldings , diff wing , leather interior etc plus 93+ 3SGTE's have a slightly different motor ...
Body colored moldings , diff wing , leather interior etc plus 93+ 3SGTE's have a slightly different motor ...
__________________
Fuck the Flag and Fuck you
If your going to post , please fucking think before you start talking out of your ass !
Fuck the Flag and Fuck you
If your going to post , please fucking think before you start talking out of your ass !
I think the question, or at least the answers, are far too broad.
First of all, are we talking 90's still?
And body lines don't change within a generation. The '88-92 MX-6 is the same for every year, every trim. Unless you count the black trim around the doors on the GT's, or the different grill on the later models. But is that enough to say it looks different? Not to me.
The 1st gen RX-7 had 2 different engines, and several trim levels. But they all look the same. So are we talking performance, or looks?
For rotaries I'd go with the 1st gen, because that was the first major production rotary in the U.S., and in a car with (to me) timeless beauty. The 3rd gen holds value perhaps, but it never was cheap. Twin turbos complicated the engine for the do-it-yourselfer.
I guess I am really just biased towards Mazda. Looking out my window I see the resemblance to the early Z cars, but looking under the hood I know I have something completely different than any other auto manufacturer dares to produce.
First of all, are we talking 90's still?
And body lines don't change within a generation. The '88-92 MX-6 is the same for every year, every trim. Unless you count the black trim around the doors on the GT's, or the different grill on the later models. But is that enough to say it looks different? Not to me.
The 1st gen RX-7 had 2 different engines, and several trim levels. But they all look the same. So are we talking performance, or looks?
For rotaries I'd go with the 1st gen, because that was the first major production rotary in the U.S., and in a car with (to me) timeless beauty. The 3rd gen holds value perhaps, but it never was cheap. Twin turbos complicated the engine for the do-it-yourselfer.
I guess I am really just biased towards Mazda. Looking out my window I see the resemblance to the early Z cars, but looking under the hood I know I have something completely different than any other auto manufacturer dares to produce.
The first engine to carry VTEC was the B16A1, the first year of VTEC was 1989, these engines were ONLY IN EUROPE AND JAPAN. Even the Prelude wasn't the first car in the US to have VTEC, the 90 NSX would have been the first. The first USDM Prelude to come with VTEC was in 94, packing the H22A1. Enthusiasts
. . .
. . .
__________________
onecattyKat: everybody wants colby
onecattyKat: everybody wants colby
Last edited by Vito_Corleone; Apr 5, 2004 at 03:51 AM.
Originally posted by Vito_Corleone
The first engine to carry VTEC was the B16A1, the first year of VTEC was 1989, these engines were ONLY IN EUROPE AND JAPAN. Even the Prelude wasn't the first car in the US to have VTEC, the 92 GSR/NSX would have been the firsts. The first USDM Prelude to come with VTEC was in 94, packing the H22A1. Enthusiasts
. . .
The first engine to carry VTEC was the B16A1, the first year of VTEC was 1989, these engines were ONLY IN EUROPE AND JAPAN. Even the Prelude wasn't the first car in the US to have VTEC, the 92 GSR/NSX would have been the firsts. The first USDM Prelude to come with VTEC was in 94, packing the H22A1. Enthusiasts
. . .
__________________
We are not the same I am a martian.
We are not the same I am a martian.


