yea no shit ....but hey ss camaros arent slow at all....i think it was a great kill.

 

I dont know how some people can tolerate hearing that god awful noise coming from there car all the time.

 

Yeah...so? the camaro also had over 1000+ pounds more weight to move...its all about power to weight ratio

 

+1 i wasn't going to bring that up but i guess it needed to be said. I bet that little green thing was gutted to hell probably had milk crates for seats j/k on the milk crates

 

so what? the civic is clearly faster and pulled really hard on it...so it doesnt matter...its just a respectable honda....there are some of those these days.....not all of them are ricers

 

your definition of hard is way different then mine watch the vid closely you will hear the camaro let off before the honda hits its brakes....the honda was faster. to me its not that impressive

p.s. respectable hondas only have 2 wheels

 

i gotta kinda agree with you.....i mean the hatch was faster,but i think some people forget about the whole engine swap part of it.....the camaro seemed still pretty much stock....it takes that much to make a honda beat a SS....if you took the same amount of money that to guy spent on the motor swap for the honda and put it in the camaro.....and ran the same race again.....it wouldnt even be close..

 

1-2 cars isn't "pulled hard"

yes the honda is the faster car congrats, nice sleeper but I'd rather have a ss

 

yea well you also gotta consider your paying way much more money for an ss thats stock....a honda hatch that year with the k20 swap your still gunna pay less then if you bought an ss im sure...i like ss camaros...but that hatch is def quick....and if you turbo those things they have so much potential to be 10 second cars...so you c4 you can disrespect hondas with four wheels all you want...but to each his own

 

i guess i would just take the SS over a hatch if i had the choice....the hatch was fast...but only beat the SS by like car or so...i guess ur right "to each his own"