Nissan Titan
Originally posted by Graves
The Ford was rated @ 300 2 years ago when I first started reading about it at work. The TItan has a 900 payload w/ the big tow pakage. that isn't a standard option. I went by the 5.4 due to it is the same size engine. Kinda like compareing the specs of a civic to a vette.
The Ford was rated @ 300 2 years ago when I first started reading about it at work. The TItan has a 900 payload w/ the big tow pakage. that isn't a standard option. I went by the 5.4 due to it is the same size engine. Kinda like compareing the specs of a civic to a vette.
Graves my friend, there is much about the specs on a Titan you are unaware of. Also, the 5.4 specs i quoted you came from the GSM i know down at Freedom. He reconfirmed the specs with the fleet manager there for me.
I can see why one would want to compare Ford's larger v-8 to Nissans standard v-8, but either way you look at it the power plant comes up short for Ford. The reason i used the 4.6 for Ford is because that is the entry level engine as standard, where as the Titan's power plant is standard on all models.
When one compares things to each other it should be apples to apples or better yet standard to standard. And no, its not like comparing a civic to a vette, you are just grasping at things now.
I can see why one would want to compare Ford's larger v-8 to Nissans standard v-8, but either way you look at it the power plant comes up short for Ford. The reason i used the 4.6 for Ford is because that is the entry level engine as standard, where as the Titan's power plant is standard on all models.
When one compares things to each other it should be apples to apples or better yet standard to standard. And no, its not like comparing a civic to a vette, you are just grasping at things now.
__________________
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
Originally posted by justtruckin'
900???? i coulda sworn it was 9800...perhaps that was just me. .
900???? i coulda sworn it was 9800...perhaps that was just me. .
Another interesting tid bit on the powerplants of these trucks, which is very important of you are to use your truck for towing or offroading.
Ford
4.6ltr: 232hp @ 4750 and 291tq @ 3450
5.4tlr: 260hp @ 4500 and 350tq @ 2500
Nissan
5.6ltr 305hp @ 4900
379tq @ 3600<-here's the kicker, 80% of that tq is availible
@ 1000rpm with 90% being availible before 2500rpm.
So in other words the ford v-8's don't have as much low down grunt and run out of steam up top.
These are 2003 specs before Ford decided to change the power train ratings, as i do not know the 04 specs.
Ford
4.6ltr: 232hp @ 4750 and 291tq @ 3450
5.4tlr: 260hp @ 4500 and 350tq @ 2500
Nissan
5.6ltr 305hp @ 4900
379tq @ 3600<-here's the kicker, 80% of that tq is availible
@ 1000rpm with 90% being availible before 2500rpm.
So in other words the ford v-8's don't have as much low down grunt and run out of steam up top.
These are 2003 specs before Ford decided to change the power train ratings, as i do not know the 04 specs.
__________________
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
Last edited by tampamax; Jan 12, 2004 at 07:01 AM.
caveat: the comparasions above were made by the standard entry 4x4 for both manufacturer's.
__________________
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
Last edited by tampamax; Jan 10, 2004 at 07:45 PM.
Eh, to each there own.
Remember this guys when his Ford is on the side of the road or stuck in mud, just crawl on through. J/K
Remember this guys when his Ford is on the side of the road or stuck in mud, just crawl on through. J/K
__________________
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.
You don't like it? So sue me. Don't take me seriously though.


