You work at mitsu? If so I might be interested in contacting you for some oem parts.

 

Sorry don't work at Mitsubishi, If I did my car would be perfect inside and out.

 

Cool, be sure to update your thread if that fixes it. BTW, you owe me a 10 dollar diagnosis fee if my guess turns out to be right.

I went with that PP because it was the heaviest PP they offer. I was actually going to go with the lighter one (I think it's 1900 lbs, darn near stock) but they recommended I go with the heavier one for my application. I'm sick and tired of the disengagement problems I had with my 2600, replacing and adjusting everything in the clutch system and still never getting it the way I wanted it. I'm convinced it's not possible to get the kind of clutch disengagement I want with a DSM hydraulic system and a 2600 PP, so I looked for alternatives and found this. The feramic material on the flywheel side is the big deal here; supposedly this clutch will hold 400-450 whp. I'd have much preferred a torque number considering the variability in potential torque on a setup making 450 whp, but I'm sure it's good enough for my little stock turbo car.

I'm on the 14b; I'm not sure I could make good use of C16. I figure 110 will be good enough for what I'm doing, but I have no experience running race gas so I'll have to see how it goes. Mostly, I can't afford the extra cash for c16 if I'm not absolutely sure it would make a difference.


I'll take pics of the bolts when I get home later tonight. I'll also check the vfaq again- maybe I just didn't notice the difference in the pics.