RevHard 02 Si whp ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 14, 2005 | 02:40 PM

#11 (permalink)

Cronic

Guest

Posts: n/a

Please disregard last information I read INCORRECTLY on bore and stroke of the 02 SI... stupid internet.

You should be making about 250 max whp @8K rpm.

Mar 14, 2005 | 02:48 PM

#12 (permalink)

silverstreak

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 60

Likes: 0

Dont forget to add in the crappy stock cams that dont breath for shit.

Mar 14, 2005 | 03:51 PM

#13 (permalink)

silverstreak

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 60

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikebish86

sounds purty good, but remember 250fwhp is nothin when its not in the good power band...ie 6-8xxx rpm. that was my buddies problem, when he finally pumped up the boost he was makin over 400whp on the gsr but not until like 6500 and up, which does nothing for you when you think about it, b/c ur shifting at 8-9000.

Well my power band will be different than your friends. I only have vtec on the intake side and only two lobes, and that crossover is at 2200rpm. So diet vtec and real vtec are two different animals. I would not be able to take the k20a3 to 8000. But I do have low end tq for a honda.

Mar 14, 2005 | 05:23 PM

#14 (permalink)

Rdline1

Hi Hi Hi?

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 5,184

Likes: 0

with 10 psi you should easily see 250 wheels. if i were you, id find a type s or a type r head, the cams and vtec should help you a TON in the top end....

__________________

98 Camry w00t! (daily ride)
91' Eclipse GS-t (she's alive!!)
AOL IM: usfbull49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

When a jelly fish comes out of my ass, I'll take pics.

Mar 14, 2005 | 06:27 PM

#15 (permalink)

mikebish86

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 942

Likes: 0

yeh thats very tru....

__________________

Mar 15, 2005 | 03:49 AM

#16 (permalink)

silverstreak

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 60

Likes: 0

That would really let it breath better. Only bad thing about that is my tranny would cause it to fall out of vtec with every shift.

Mar 15, 2005 | 06:18 AM

#17 (permalink)

juiced2ndgenteg

.........................

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 3,562

Likes: 0

I have read those a3 cranks SUCK! greddy removed the rotating assembly out of their EP3. just be easy... 250whp should NOT be a problem.

Mar 15, 2005 | 07:44 AM

#18 (permalink)

qitstrn

Can you spot me 20 cars?

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 4,464

Likes: 0

i have seen 250-260 on those kits without a problem. Which is not bad but not great. I personally like to see 300whp after spending the money on a turbo kit.

Mar 15, 2005 | 07:49 AM

#19 (permalink)

silverstreak

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 60

Likes: 0

The crank and rods are crap. I would not take it over 300hp. That seems to be the breaking point of the a3. If she does blow, then ill have to put the k24 bottom end in there. That would be stronger and a tq monster.