General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Ecoboost is already showing its potential

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:55 AM
  #41 (permalink)  
CoRDiTe's Avatar
Not Mad
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by edmel89
The new SHO is not the best in styling, its not ugly by any means, but just not me, but everything else is awesome, but that engine is awesome come on! I cant wait for the new ford line up's to be cheaper.

For me it has one of the best styling cars in a long time. I like the way it looks. I am a very picky person and this car looks very nice on the outside and has really really nice interior to me. Lots of other cars looks so plain jane in the inside.


__________________
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #42 (permalink)  
Puto's Avatar
El Puto ©
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,286
Likes: 0
Default

^ I have to agree, Fords interiors have gotten a lot nicer lately, a la european.
__________________
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #43 (permalink)  
CoRDiTe's Avatar
Not Mad
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Puto
^ I have to agree, Fords interiors have gotten a lot nicer lately, a la european.
Only problem I have with ford is that..........

1. Lots of cars have the same interior.
2. They don't change much between models
3. Lots of their cars have plain jane interior however they have been stepping up their game the past few years.
__________________
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:03 AM
  #44 (permalink)  
John's Avatar
lol @ tampa
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 41,257
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq!
Thats true, but up until the last few years, the 4.6 was one of the most advanced V8s ford had to offer. I hate that american companies are just now moving to high compression DOHC layouts that allow for much more power at much higher fuel efficiencies. There is a price difference, but its there for a reason. The mustang was still being offered with a straight axle, cheap plastic feeling interior, 2wd, and technology thats been around for 40 years under the hood. The S4 has AWD, full leather interior with classy-as-hell wood or aluminum trim, auto-levelling HIDs, in dash touch screen navigation, a suspension not designed for a tow truck, and an engine that manages a specific output of over 80bhp/L as opposed to the mustangs 65bhp/L. I'm not saying the Gt isn't a great value, especially now that they have the new 5.0 which will actually approach a respectable specific output of 80bhp/L. It just bothers me that domestic companies are so far behind in the technology field. I know some people aren't willing to pay the price difference, but when I had the choice of buying a new-to-me vehicle from the early 2000s, I picked ze germans over the good ol' USA because I can't find anything better than the feel of a german sedan built to cruise the autobahn.
I agree with everything you're saying, but again you're comparing luxury sport sedans with double (+ change) the MSRP to a entry level sports car, completely different ballparks, nay, completely different sports. That extra 25k buys you a lot of nice things, like the features you mentioned, and the technology used to make 400+ hp clean, modern V8's. Don't be so short sighted, just 14 years ago 300 hp was enough to power japanese supercars, and most v8s were just pushing 225-300hp tops. Also, dont forget the difference in philosophy, between torquey american v8's and high revving euro-asian v8s. Both powerful, just different ways of delivery.
__________________
2008 AW 335xi coupe - Dinan stage 2 - DCI - Dinan axle back

|Full color business cards||flyers||postcards||more|
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:06 AM
  #45 (permalink)  
power2weight's Avatar
-eats the last cookie.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John
You're comparing the Mustang 4.6 OHV to the DOHC V8's, so of course they are going to make more HP (saying nothing about torque). Also, the 4.6 is spec'd to run on 87 octane, which means dramatically lower compression ratios and less aggressive cam profiles, smaller ports, etc. Do we even need to discuss the vast difference of 25-30k+ in MSRPs? Neither Euro nor Asian produce a V8 in the same price class of the Americans, but you didnt mention that
I hope that is just the "V" key key is close to the "C" key right?
__________________
"They must really feed each other to the lions down there........"
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:32 AM
  #46 (permalink)  
power2weight's Avatar
-eats the last cookie.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq!
Thats true, but up until the last few years, the 4.6 was one of the most advanced V8s ford had to offer. I hate that american companies are just now moving to high compression DOHC layouts that allow for much more power at much higher fuel efficiencies.
The 4.6L has been DOHC since 93. DOHC does not in anyway shape or form equate to fuel efficency, witness RS4's & M3's garbage 14/20 compared to the last of the NA CTSV's 16/25.

Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq!
There is a price difference, but its there for a reason. The mustang was still being offered with a straight axle, cheap plastic feeling interior, 2wd, and technology thats been around for 40 years under the hood. The S4 has AWD, full leather interior with classy-as-hell wood or aluminum trim, auto-levelling HIDs, in dash touch screen navigation, a suspension not designed for a tow truck, and an engine that manages a specific output of over 80bhp/L as opposed to the mustangs 65bhp/L. I'm not saying the Gt isn't a great value, especially now that they have the new 5.0 which will actually approach a respectable specific output of 80bhp/L.
I'm glad you at least recognize the price part of this equation. There is nothing to compare between a $30K pony car and a $60K Euro luxo fighter. Nothing.

I don't know how many times it has to be explained ricer math. Displacement equals low end torque. If you plan on taking that displacement and making it rev higher to obtain high horsepower levels, you will pay more for that privilege.

Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq!
It just bothers me that domestic companies are so far behind in the technology field. I know some people aren't willing to pay the price difference, but when I had the choice of buying a new-to-me vehicle from the early 2000s, I picked ze germans over the good ol' USA because I can't find anything better than the feel of a german sedan built to cruise the autobahn.
Please define how the new 5.0L (plasma lined cylinder walls), the EcoBoost, or the first EPA certified 300HP/30MPG motor is behind in technology. This should be great.
__________________
"They must really feed each other to the lions down there........"
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:00 AM
  #47 (permalink)  
omgwtfbbq!'s Avatar
I race sailboats
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by power2weight
I don't know how many times it has to be explained ricer math. Displacement equals low end torque. If you plan on taking that displacement and making it rev higher to obtain high horsepower levels, you will pay more for that privilege.
My S4 makes peak torque at 1850 RPM, displacement = torque, but so do small turbochargers, similar to those found hanging on ecoboost engines. My roommates inline 4 powered VW makes over 270lb/ft of torque at the wheels, and its only a 2L.


Originally Posted by power2weight
Please define how the new 5.0L (plasma lined cylinder walls), the EcoBoost, or the first EPA certified 300HP/30MPG motor is behind in technology. This should be great.
Its behind because it isn't coming out until the 2011 model line, even though ford holds the patent for its cylinder walls, Nissan has been using that technology since they started developing the GTR. The ecoboost is again brand new, my audi is 9 years old and sports the same technology. Everything ford is doing they are only just now doing, which makes them behind.
__________________
Bitches don't know about the twin turbo

BLACK FENDER PART OUT
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #48 (permalink)  
bitemark46's Avatar
Got traction?
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by omgwtfbbq!
My roommates inline 4 powered VW makes over 270lb/ft of torque at the wheels, and its only a 2L.
At what 6k?
__________________
98' cobra
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #49 (permalink)  
Orion ZyGarian's Avatar
7M 2JZ bird in pear tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,532
Likes: 0
Default

Actually, VWs tend to do a better job making torque than HP
__________________

ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #50 (permalink)  
omgwtfbbq!'s Avatar
I race sailboats
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 0
Default

Below 2500 rshared_pm. His engine only revs to 6500. Tiny Turbo = shit ton of torque.
__________________
Bitches don't know about the twin turbo

BLACK FENDER PART OUT
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 PM.