Chevy Kills Plans for a Camaro Z28
HAHAHAHAHAH!!! that made me lol. I went from 32mpg to 20mpg. You dont hear me bitching in every thread! I'm having fun!
__________________
2012 FIAT 500 ABARTH
2012 FIAT 500 ABARTH
I was suprised too. I was expecting more like 19-20, but got 24 all the way there...I had a lid, headers, duals, and a tune so maybe that helped.....BTW a 300hp 2600lbs camaro would be nice, but that doesn't mean there is anything wrong with a 3500-3800lb camaro with 500+. Some1 that is so brand loyal or biased towards a certain "sort" of car doesn't seem like much of a car guy to me. I have no problem giving respect to a car when respect is do no matter what make/model it is.....
Anyways, I dont want to get involved in such a debate, I dont have enough time in the day to sit and reply to everything. I'm just saying, LOWER the weight and it would HELP, not SOLVE the problem.
__________________
2012 FIAT 500 ABARTH
2012 FIAT 500 ABARTH
Obviously a light car would be good. I don't understand why they wouldn't make it lighter either really....The vette isn't heavy at all at something like 3200lbs or w/e. I really hate how big all the new cars are getting, especially the new dodge SRT-8 series. 20 inch wheels should NOT be on any sort of "muscle" car.
yea, I'm not sure what they were thinking. The cars are fast as it is, but they would be so much better with a manual and less weight. I don't expect the new camaro to be even close to as heavy and they'll still have the 6spd!
Why not build a bigger-than-elise car for normal sized people but keep its weight down, put an adequately powered motor in it, and voila! You have an instant hit. Not to mention less material would be used, then production costs go down, etc. etc. Do I really have to explain it?
__________________

ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h

ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
Doesn't really work like that. A lot of the extra bulk in these cars comes from safety features required to meet strict federal crash regulations. Heavy side-impact door beams, bulky front/rear bumpers, heavier safety glass and a bunch of airbags just to name a few things.
The use of lighter materials like Alluminium, Titanium and Carbon would solve the issue, but drive prices into the sky because those materials are more expensive (and not as easy to get in massive quantities) than steel.
Manufacturers know they can't do much about weight savings, so they're focusing more on developing better engine/fuel technology.
The use of lighter materials like Alluminium, Titanium and Carbon would solve the issue, but drive prices into the sky because those materials are more expensive (and not as easy to get in massive quantities) than steel.
Manufacturers know they can't do much about weight savings, so they're focusing more on developing better engine/fuel technology.



hehe