General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

e85 stations

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
GsT Racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
back in a 4g63
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Default e85 stations

so when is pinellas county and/or surrounding counties going to get an e85 station? has anyone heard of any plans for one? I know there is one in jacksonville and miami, and a few near the kennedy space center, but how bout the west side!? lol
__________________

"All I can tell you is... the gun had an owner, something happened, and suddenly the gun didnt have an owner anymore."
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
93LowBody's Avatar
TR Balla Donor Supreme
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Default

E85 is gay
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:35 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
P057's Avatar
isuck
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

why?
__________________
Originally Posted by BigBadBuick
Originally Posted by TNathe
so because wikileaks doesnt have it means it didnt happen? Now there's some logic!
LOGIC? You seriously want to invoke logic in a conversation about fake hijackings, missiles hitting the pentagon, and bombs planted throughout the world trade center? I thought it was a given that logic was checked at the door when entering one of these threads.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
93LowBody's Avatar
TR Balla Donor Supreme
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PØ57
why?
heres just one review on it. Lower power, Lower MPG, the lower cost of e85 for them was offset by the lower MPG.

E85 Vs. Gasoline Comparison Test
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
FrodoGT's Avatar
Found the Vtec switch.
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Default

BUT! Higher octane=cheap race fuel.
__________________


TR Old Skool EF Crew #24
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
93LowBody's Avatar
TR Balla Donor Supreme
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Default

^ if you need 103 octane and dont mind the shitty gas mileage.

< will never DD a car that needs 103 octane.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
RITZ7's Avatar
is a legend.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 0
Default

e85 gtfo my face
__________________
AMERICA FUCK NO!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 05:12 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
P057's Avatar
isuck
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 93LowBody
heres just one review on it. Lower power, Lower MPG, the lower cost of e85 for them was offset by the lower MPG.

E85 Vs. Gasoline Comparison Test
I was asking why the OP cares or even wants it?

More than likely won't be good for his engine anyways due to the corrosiveness of the E-fuels.
__________________
Originally Posted by BigBadBuick
Originally Posted by TNathe
so because wikileaks doesnt have it means it didnt happen? Now there's some logic!
LOGIC? You seriously want to invoke logic in a conversation about fake hijackings, missiles hitting the pentagon, and bombs planted throughout the world trade center? I thought it was a given that logic was checked at the door when entering one of these threads.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #9 (permalink)  
GsT Racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
back in a 4g63
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Default

people! and i use the term loosely...

I don't care how well it works. have you heard of any stations opening up?
__________________

"All I can tell you is... the gun had an owner, something happened, and suddenly the gun didnt have an owner anymore."
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
plazma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 93LowBody
heres just one review on it. Lower power, Lower MPG, the lower cost of e85 for them was offset by the lower MPG.

E85 Vs. Gasoline Comparison Test

Well i'm thinking this is a serious question so let me see if I can shed some light on it for you.

First to answer you quote.
Lower power- on the flex fuel vehicle it doesn't take advantage of the higher octane. If one was so inclined you could actually increase performance in way of a tune/chip (or more timing for older cars with a distributer). Also to be noted the lack of performance was very very little.

Lower mpg- absolutely true and to be expected. The key differenceis 85% of the fuel is made from corn which is produced here in america (keeps money here and pays our farmers which in turn bolsters our economy). If they gear up to really produce e-85 then the cost will drop a good bit which is alot more then can be said for the current oil costs.

Cost- see above and again to mention sending tons of money over to the middle east and to chavez rather then keeping it here in our states. Also in case you didn't know as late as a few years ago (when I lived in Indiana) the government would pay the farmers to not plant certain crops (mainly corn) to help keep supply and demand in check. If we could stop paying people to not do something and get back to paying people to produce more to help keep prices low it makes good sense.


As for why I would like to see us start using more ethanol based fuels it will help out the economy here and hurt it over in places run by people we don't see eye to eye with.
I like the performance that you can get using e-85 and if we had a station here I would use it in my turbo car. It's cheaper then race fuel and has alot more octane then premium pump fuel and is at least 70 cents a gallon cheaper. (based on premium being 3.82 today and e-85 being 2.86 ) In a tuner/muscle car you can take advantage of the octane to the tune. (my car being able to run and extra 6 psi and 4 degrees of timing means another 85rwhp-100 ft/pds dyno proven, as thats how I run on a blend of 93 and 110 being about 100 octane. Might be able to get more as e-85 is 103 octane)

I don't think we should convert to e-85 for the emissions strictly.
I also don't think we should get rid of gas and only use e-85 as if we had a bad crop season we could be in for some problems. I do think we should use it alot more then we do now though.

If nothing else math shows why it makes sense.
On gas the tahoe got 18.5 mpg
On e-85 it got 13.5 mpg
A difference of 26.5%
Premium gas today at 3.82 average
Regular was 3.47 average
e-85 (higher octance then premium) 2.86 average
Thats .96 in difference so even if it gets 26.5 % less fuel milage the e-85 is still less expensive by a bit mile to mile. (35% would make it about the same as premium fuel)
It is a .61 difference over regular means e-85 would cost slightly more to run.

So if you put regular in your driver (if you even can as alot of nicer performance cars require premium from the factory) its a bit cheaper and your money leaves the states to run it. Don't count on this being the case for long as prices continue to go up daily with no end in sight. When the difference crosses 75 cents you might as well buy the e-85 as its the same money.

What was your complaint about e-85 again?


Gas price source - http://www.fuelgaugereport.com/
__________________
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic17840_1.gif

My Project
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 AM.