General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Toyota goes to Nascar

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #81 (permalink)  
VolvoBoiClw's Avatar
Ru Noises...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,206
Likes: 0
Default

well i hope it doesnt all go to nascar like nissan ect but good luck toyota dont fuck up
__________________
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:33 AM
  #82 (permalink)  
myltwon's Avatar
Bolt-On 2v GT
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bilbo Baggins
Nascar on these "primative" engines Run cars with RESTRICTOR Plates at almost 200 mph all day long.. Lets See Ferrari try that.. Give nascar forced induction, Fuel injection, OHC's, and 12 cylinders and they it would be like driving a top fuel... around a oval
people think just because they work for nascar they have 3 teeth and a mullet and go to discount auto for their parts
__________________


"Does this look like a piece of crap to you? Like them spinnin' tires do you?"
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:06 AM
  #83 (permalink)  
canyouheminow's Avatar
Calmer than you are
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Default

Toyota in NASCAR is like having Strippers in Church the 2 just don't mix well
__________________
TR's WTR Crew Member #6
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:53 AM
  #84 (permalink)  
GT5.0HO_STANG's Avatar
Bred2Run
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Red face

Why the hell are they going to put a rice burner in nascar when its an american sport. kind of like how NOPI is for imports and NHRA is for american cars
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:58 AM
  #85 (permalink)  
TNathe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,565
Likes: 0
Default

You guys must not be thinking very far...if all of our money goes out to Japan because they sell more and make a better car, then we wont have any money here, thus no one buying American cars, thus no jobs to build the American cars and nobody able to drive them.
yeah because all I see driving on the roads is Toyotas.

You are a tool to the nth degree man.. and have absoulutely NO clue as to the depth of the talent that NASCAR engineers have..
Put the euro/F1, etc engineers on the same playing field (no electronics, carbd, pushrod, etc) and not have practically unlimited budgets.. or flip it and give your NASCAR engineers more to work with...

I bet they'd both be about equal.
Whatev, you guys are whining like bitches cause Toyota never built a v8 pushrod engine and therefore it shouldn't be allowed to run in NASCAR. Like ANYTHING I see at the Daytona 500 resembles anything close to what I can buy at the showroom. V8 Monte Carlo. HAHAH, they should have but the didn't.

I would hope to god anyone that is pushing that kind of HP/Weight ratio could make a car run 200mph all day. Shit, Mustang Cobras and my 96hp bike will damn near do that and you can buy them at the dealerships. I don't see what's so impressive. Any car with that kind of HP/Weight ratio and the right gearing could do that an more all day.
__________________
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 05:56 AM
  #86 (permalink)  
myltwon's Avatar
Bolt-On 2v GT
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,713
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TNathe
V8 Monte Carlo. HAHAH, they should have but the didn't.
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/n....cfm/id/38642/



suspensions, and revised exterior styling. Both the Impala sedan and the Monte Carlo coupe are offered in LS, LT 3.5, LT 3.9, LTZ, and sporty SS trim. LS and LT 3.5 models come with a 211-hp 3.5-liter V6, up 30 hp from 2005's base engine. LT 3.9 and LTZ models have a 242-hp 3.9-liter V6. SS models get a 303-hp V8 with GM's Active Fuel Management, which deactivates four cylinders under light throttle conditions to save fuel. All come with a 4-speed automatic transmission. SS models have sport suspension and 18-inch wheels; others get 16- or 17, depending on model.

Available for all Impala models except SS is a front bench seat for 6-passenger seating. SS and all Monte Carlos come only with buckets. Head-protecting curtain side airbags are standard on Impala. They are not available for Monte Carlo, but front torso side airbags are optional. ABS and traction control, and a tire-pressure monitor are available. GM's OnStar Assistance is standard. Available are a remote starter that turns the engine on via the keyfob, leather upholstery, and satellite radio. We have not yet tested the 2006 Monte Carlo.
insert foot in mouth.

not exactly nascar spec, but you get the idea
__________________


"Does this look like a piece of crap to you? Like them spinnin' tires do you?"
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 05:57 AM
  #87 (permalink)  
BigBadBuick's Avatar
Livin' Large
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TNathe
yeah because all I see driving on the roads is Toyotas.



Whatev, you guys are whining like bitches cause Toyota never built a v8 pushrod engine and therefore it shouldn't be allowed to run in NASCAR.
I get a kick out of you lumping everyone in this thread together and crediting them with the opinions stated by ONE person. Then accusing them of "whining like bitches?" Must suck to be a ricer........

I would hope to god anyone that is pushing that kind of HP/Weight ratio could make a car run 200mph all day. Shit, Mustang Cobras and my 96hp bike will damn near do that and you can buy them at the dealerships. I don't see what's so impressive.
You really really really have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Do you know anything about the rules concerning things like compression ratio, cubic inch limit, cam lift limits, the fact that they are running a flat tappet camshaft, and then they do it all afternoon without the motor disintegrating? The horsepower they get out of those motors with the rules, and then a restricter plate is absolutely amazing. But I know, it's a V-8, they're easy to make horsepower with Mustang cobras have 32 valves, a hydraulic roller cam, AND forced induction. All of which are not allowed in NASCAR, plus they don't run 200 mph. Bikes have no business in the conversation at all, so I'll just leave that one alone. If you would get over yourself and take some time to learn a little, you would realize what a ridiculous statement that was and how impressive the numbers are given the rules they have to work with.......
__________________

Last edited by BigBadBuick; Jan 26, 2006 at 06:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #88 (permalink)  
TNathe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,565
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/n....cfm/id/38642/



insert foot in mouth.

not exactly nascar spec, but you get the idea
foot in mouth, but it wasn't till now that they developed it. Anyways, yeah BBB, I'm a ricer If yanking the motor and having it rebuilt with forged internals, ported head, full 'race' balanced, and completely fabricating a turbo system from scrap makes me a "ricer" then I guess I am. While we're stereotyping, it must suck to be 80 yrs old and migrate back and forth across the country twice a year. /offtopic

All I am trying to say is who REALLY cares if Toyota, Nissan or whoev enters NASCAR? Do YOU really care? Is it going to effect your livelyhood? What exactly are the specs of these engines? How many CFMs are their carbs allowed to flow? What is the gear ratio of their transmissions? And why Don't bikes belong in this discussion? Because they have two wheels? Because somehow the factory engineers at Honda, Suzuki, Kawasaki have figured a way of making 150hp go near the 200mph mark and do it ALL AFTERNOON. They are carbed and they don't use forced unduction. My point is you take ANY vehicle with the HP/Weight ratio that these guys have and gear it right and your set. Granted, making the HP needed to do it is a feat in itself using 20 yr old technology and yes i understand the difficulty of making a lot of horsepower without forced induction. But in a way they are using forced induction. How much extra air are they funneling into the engine by reaching speeds that high. I think its pretty similar to the scramjet or whatever its called, the faster you go the more air you can send to the engine the more power you can make.

Whatev, I've wasted enough time on this topic, in the end NASCAR is still BORING and sees way too much airtime.
__________________
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #89 (permalink)  
robofunc's Avatar
rocktastic
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Default

NASCAR motors are a testament to what can be done with pushrods, for sure. I just think the series is boring and irrelevant.

Since these fantasy machines have nothing in common with anything except other NASCAR racers, who cares if Toyota wants to waste time and money driving in circles with the rest of them? Yeah, NASCAR is an "American sport," but it's about competition. If Toyota in NASCAR bothers you so much, just say "I hate the Japanese." That's what you really want to say, after all, isn't it?

IMHO, NASCAR is a bloated dinosoar who's days are numbered. They need to find a better way to breathe life into the series than running a "Camry."
__________________
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #90 (permalink)  
BigBadBuick's Avatar
Livin' Large
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TNathe
foot in mouth, but it wasn't till now that they developed it. Anyways, yeah BBB, I'm a ricer If yanking the motor and having it rebuilt with forged internals, ported head, full 'race' balanced, and completely fabricating a turbo system from scrap makes me a "ricer" then I guess I am.
Boy, that one went right over your head.
__________________
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.