General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

20K smackdown- Lancer Rallifart VS SE-R Spec V

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #61 (permalink)  
TurboSpecV57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

www.powertechimports.com

yes i will admit that those are not my car, the vid running the evos is a brand new spec, so there gose your used car argument

and why tell me to shut the fuck up im running the exact same set up as those cars, so explain to me why im wrong..... the only reason why their not my vids is becuase i havnt had the fortune to have a vid with me

yes vr4 galants are nice, but to say they have a better drivetrain, i dont know that much about them but i always though that those trannys really suck, youll find more problems on a dsm then a turbo V anyday
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #62 (permalink)  
Tom N's Avatar
Non DSM.....DSM guy
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Default

Factory dsm trannies have run in the 8`s. sounds pretty stout to me.
DSM are alot older and have been beat on for years. Lets see how well the Spec V`s hold up to years and years of boosted fun.
I think we both know that they wont.
__________________
Tom
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:42 PM
  #63 (permalink)  
TurboSpecV57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

wow becuase you own one and drive it everyday, dont get pissed becase our cars put out decent power at low boost, and can handle it

true a stock one has seen 8's but i know millions of storys of them just breaking downnnn

when i was debating to do the turbo or buy a car to build, i went looking for dsm's..... and i found very few that had a 100%decent drivetrain, so many had a tranny grind, or a gear pop out or some other problem...

Last edited by TurboSpecV57; Aug 25, 2005 at 06:47 PM.
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #64 (permalink)  
Tom N's Avatar
Non DSM.....DSM guy
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboSpecV57
wow becuase you own one and drive it everyday, dont get pissed becase our cars put out decent power at low boost, and can handle it

true a stock one has seen 8's but i know millions of storys of them just breaking downnnn


Find me a older car that doesnt just brake.
I can go to Nissan right now and see several brand new sentras that are broke down. Whats your point.
I am sorry but 280hp doesnt do anything for me.
Being proud that your motor can handle that isnt any thing to be that proud of.
When the stock block can handle over 500hp then you have something to be proud of.
__________________
Tom
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #65 (permalink)  
Antontoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TRIPLE G
I dont know a whole lot about the SRT but i was under the impresion that it handled extremely well.
Nuh it doesn't, SCC did a stage 3 mopar stiff coilover suspention, firmer bushings, alignment, bars, KD max summer tires and pulled only .92g on skidpad and less then 70mph through slalom.

A milder setup, Nismo R-Tune Spec V did .95g and 72.9mph - stock EVO numbers.
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #66 (permalink)  
Road Rage's Avatar
Shake n' Bake
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboSpecV57
dont get pissed becase our cars put out decent power at low boost, and can handle it

Hahahahahahahaha
__________________

Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #67 (permalink)  
TurboSpecV57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

yeah on a car the come factory turbocharged and is built for it

im not trying to say that im faster then you, im just trying to point out the things that work well for our cars, but i still think that 130+whp over stock on just 8psi is pritty dame good

how many sentras have you seen that walk evos, and other high dollar cars, true you can make them SOOO much faster then the spec, but thats not the point. The point is that the Spec is a pritty decent car NA, and with a turbo its a completly different car that performs 100% better, there are days when i feels like the car ran better then it did stock
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #68 (permalink)  
Road Rage's Avatar
Shake n' Bake
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 4drwhore
you sure thats on all years? i thought most of the fox bodys had the same trans/suspension/brakes no matter what
well i said v6 vs cobra, fox bodies were 4cyl and the cobra was only made in 93 and same applies.....
__________________

Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #69 (permalink)  
TurboSpecV57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

hey my first car was an SVO mustang 84, history question what came in the SVO stang
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #70 (permalink)  
Tom N's Avatar
Non DSM.....DSM guy
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Antontoo
Nuh it doesn't, SCC did a stage 3 mopar stiff coilover suspention, firmer bushings, alignment, bars, KD max summer tires and pulled only .92g on skidpad and less then 70mph through slalom.

A milder setup, Nismo R-Tune Spec V did .95g and 72.9mph - stock EVO numbers.

Shows how much I know about the neon.
I will stick with the mitsubishi`s.
__________________
Tom



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:49 PM.