i thought we werent allowed to talk about used cars. tom got yelled at when talking about a used evo but now you guys are talking about used specv's.

hey turbospecv boy, are any of those vids personaly yours or your car? if not stfu and if so want to see what an awd car does with someone who knows how to drive

you sure thats on all years? i thought most of the fox bodys had the same trans/suspension/brakes no matter what

 

Want to talk about cheap.
My 91 Galant cost 2k dollars.
It has more room than a Spec V.
Its nicer, full leather interior
Has a way better motor and drivetrain.
And will walk any one of those Spec V`s at half throttle for alot less money.

 

Dont know about all the years bit the 03-04 cobra had a irs and the rest of the mustang line did not.

 

Here's how much Spec V costs - 16k fully loaded(no brembos though), if you pay more you are a chump. There is a $2000 factory rebate.

You will NEVER take home new srt4 for less then 21k.

I'd also say that then more 280hp on a light fwd is a waste.

 

No one will debate that the srt-4 cost more. But you are getting so much more for your money. Even after you spend the money on a turbo kit for the nissan you still have a car that cost about the same as a srt.
And yet it still doesnt stack up to it.
The srt comes with a motor that can handle WAY more power than the nissan.
This post started as comparing it to a mitsu ralliart though.
I wouldnt buy any of them. FWD is a waste as far as I am concerned.

 

all those links dont work for me

 

BTW turbo spec wheres a website where i can find out more information on the PTI and how much and all that good stuff...

 

I would say you are getting less, srt4 doesn't handle as well as spec and like I said ymore then 280 hp in light fwd is a waste, which you can get without much sweat out of spec.

FWD is not a waste, for someone that wants cheap performance and is excelent begginer platform.

I drove alot of cars, few were as fun as a spec imo, it's light, tossable and got a ballzy right-now! responces thx to short 6 gears, max torque at 3000rpm and drive-by-wire throttle. it feels alot faster then actually is.

 

Both of those cars are about as exciting as a mid-80's K-car. One could do much better with $20k by spending it on a 2-3 year old used car that doesn't look like a tarted up rental car.

 

For that exact reason i think a fwd is a waste.
I dont know a whole lot about the SRT but i was under the impresion that it handled extremely well.
I would still rather have the car that already comes with a fully forged motor. Than with one that will blow when you try to make any real HP with it.