General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.
View Poll Results: Srt4 Yay or Nay?
Yes, they are good cars for the price.
66
65.35%
No, they suck and its a waste of money.
29
28.71%
Maybe, dont really know about them.
6
5.94%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

srt4...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 5, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #31 (permalink)  
vertigo_16201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,924
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by TRIPLE G
I dont get it
Your dsm stock only runs low 15's, high 14's stock. So technically they are "dsm fast" too. And your 1g dsm's are far from the most elegant cars on the road.

You're prolly gonna say your dsm with afew mods will run 12's, while those same mods will get a honda in 12's too so dont go there

They are what you would call Honduh fast. I wouldnt care if they were fast they are so ugly.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #32 (permalink)  
Skittle's Avatar
You Can't Moderate Me.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,541
Likes: 0
Default

Technically,i could probaly make him DSM slow??
__________________
R.I.P Pablo "Fathead" Garcia & Kevin "Slo_Si" Gonzalez Forever in our hearts.

Reply
Old Jul 5, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #33 (permalink)  
TIM TIM TIM's Avatar
could be worse
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,421
Likes: 0
Default

lol jamie your car is slow, don't get a big head..lol jfwy i know i know "it'll rape the mustang"
__________________
aim:because tim said

www.generationsofcabinetry.com
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #35 (permalink)  
SilverSleeper's Avatar
El Tee Juan x2.... IDIOT!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Default

high 13's for around 20k aint too shabby for a new small car especially if you dont have the money to maintain a V8.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #36 (permalink)  
Skittle's Avatar
You Can't Moderate Me.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,541
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by `92CXhatch
i wonder how hard it would be to make it DSM reliable... or unreliable...
-Keith


i knew i could use this somewhere!
__________________
R.I.P Pablo "Fathead" Garcia & Kevin "Slo_Si" Gonzalez Forever in our hearts.

Reply
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 04:37 AM
  #37 (permalink)  
Tom N's Avatar
Non DSM.....DSM guy
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by VeRTigO
Your dsm stock only runs low 15's, high 14's stock. So technically they are "dsm fast" too. And your 1g dsm's are far from the most elegant cars on the road.

You're prolly gonna say your dsm with afew mods will run 12's, while those same mods will get a honda in 12's too so dont go there

I was just saying they are ugly. I cant stand the stupid bug eyes. And what honda are you going to put a exhaust, fuel pump and boost controller on and run a 12.98 in. I guess i just went there.
__________________
Tom
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #38 (permalink)  
TBSpyder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by VeRTigO


You're prolly gonna say your dsm with afew mods will run 12's, while those same mods will get a honda in 12's too so dont go there
What are you smoking? Last time I checked, it would take a HELLUVA lot more to get a Honda into the 12's. And the nice thing about DSMs is they don't have to strip their interiors and run steelies to do it....
__________________
I got a dig bick. You this read wrong. You read that wrong too.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 06:36 AM
  #39 (permalink)  
EsCoRtLvR's Avatar
Escort Connoisseur
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Phattyboiaaron
Thats not really what i was going for anyways, it is still based off the neon, which really isnt that good of a car in the first place. And i wanted to know if its like the neon (a piece of shit)... And D33flat if you read caranddriver.com the review says the seats are the most comfortable, so its not because you are big.


from the car and driver review.

The only "bad" reliability wise neons were the early first gens. I had a 98 Neon ACR and that car was a blast, yeah the interior felt cheap, but that's because it's to lighten the load. Feel lucky, the old ACR's like the one I purchased was a true sport compact, bitch didn't even come with an antenna, just a plug, let alone a radio . No cruise, nothing. But you put it on an auto-x course and that thing would truly shine. The adjustable factory koni's were a nice touch too . When it comes to sport compact, especially the Neons, Dodge has done a very good job. I have yet to drive an SRT-4, but I would expect it to be at least as good handling wise, as the old ACR 4-door I had. The crap models were and always will be the base models, they are made as cheap as possible.

If you look at other cars near it's price range in the sport compact car field you won't get anything that touches it. The Focus SVT a 16 second car with awesome handling (18k), the Civic SI(18k) another 16 second car that no offense but lacks about everywhere and costs way too much for what you get, or an RSX-S, which costs more and isn't nearly as fast. So in comparison yeah this car is the best buy for the money point blank. I would truthfully buy one if they didn't rape me on insurance . Not only for the car, but for the warranty. I love my Fords, but warranties are much better.
__________________
"Genuine" ASE certified Mazda, Hyundai, Isuzu Technician

Escort Enthusiast Site

Automotive Electrical Specialist, Tuning Specialist
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM.