VW/Audi/Porsche Tech This is where all the hot bitches hang out.

vr6, vr6, or 1.8t?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
SkwervE's Avatar
Thread Starter
realer than most
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,806
Likes: 0
Default vr6, vr6, or 1.8t?

which one do you like the most and which one in your oppinion has the MOST potential which one can be made fast the cheapest and which one has been the most reliable? post what you think about each motor..
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
BisquitMan's Avatar
Salad Tosser
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Default

This has been beat to death but I say VR6. Plenty of high HP VR's running around that are reliable if done right. Also no 1.8t can touch the 9.69@145 a VR6 powered MK3 Jetta ran. All in all, they are all VW's so I like them all.

VR6 fo life!!!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
SkwervE's Avatar
Thread Starter
realer than most
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,806
Likes: 0
Default

heh i know us regular vw tech browsers have covered this but i have seen new names posting in here..so i want to see what they think..
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
juke's Avatar
Ghetto, Like Josh Stevens
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,366
Likes: 0
Default

VR6 Most potential. 1.8T can be built a lot cheaper. Cheaper doesn't mean better for all the reasons that Biscuit Man listed. VR6's can handle anything you throw at them. I've owned both 1.8T (150hp and 180hp) and I don't think either can touch the VR6. I just think it is a superb engine.
__________________

Last edited by juke; Oct 19, 2005 at 06:16 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 06:25 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
Pdubinator's Avatar
White girls suck;)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Default

Both are good engines to modify, 1.8t will be cheeper with decent hp and the vr6's peak hp is a lot better. Go vr6 just because every one has a 1.8t too
__________________
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
Zealot's Avatar
Easy like Sunday morning
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 0
Default

VR6 has the most potential eh?



on a stock bottom end, runs 10s, and it's daily driven Just wait till he finishes building the motor.

Yes EIP has a 600hp VR6, but not only is it a R32 (almost twice the size of a 1.8t), but it also has a fully built motor. You are looking a near $20K on top of buying an R32, IF EIP ever releases the kit. You could always go with HPA that only charges $12K for the singe turbo kit or $25k for the twin turbo kit .

As for real world numbers I haven't seen one 24v with EIP's stg 2 ever get the claimed 350-400whp. The closest I've seen is ~340whp , while there are many 1.8t's with over 350whp.

This topic is definately been beaten to death all over the internet, and is just an extension of the old "no replacement for displacement " argument. The answer depends on the driver. If you want a well rounded, nice stock powerband, that you can mod a little, or have 20K to waste on modding a VW go with a VR6. (Personally if I had that much money to waste, I would drop the VW and buy an S4) If you want easily modded engine with a catalog of parts available and easily capable of high hp on a budget go with the 1.8t.

In the end, it's what ever floats your boat
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:17 AM
  #7 (permalink)  
BisquitMan's Avatar
Salad Tosser
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Default

If you look at that dyno chart you realize the powerband of a 1.8t is nothing like a VR6. The power doesn't come on for that car until 5000+ rpms, not exactly a huge powerband, you would run out of gear real quick once you are in the power.

Also on the topic of EIP's stuff, who cares about what they have to offr, there are plenty of other VR tuners out there. Schimmel Performance had a lot to do with Kirchberger's jetta (which was a 12V VR6). You talk like it takes 30,000 to make a VR6 fast and the R32 is the only car with a VR. If you want fast cheap power, get a MK3 VR6 GTI, and get a turbo kit for under $3500 or spend more and blow the doors off of a lot of cars. Nothing sounds better than a VRT.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:26 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
VTEC-THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

I really like both motors, If you are looking for a reliable car to last a long time then I would go with the VR but to be honest if you are looking for bang for the buck then I would say 1.8t would be the way to go. There small motors are made up for by their ability to have big hp gains from bolt-ons
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:26 AM
  #9 (permalink)  
BisquitMan's Avatar
Salad Tosser
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Default

No one cares about a 1.8t dyno queen. Here's a real picture for you!!


Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 03:54 AM
  #10 (permalink)  
VTEC-THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

I have a question for all you VR guys... if we were at a VW meet would you look down upon a 1.8t driver or would you "appreciate" if you will what they like or what they are into? I ask this because last time I was at a meet all the VR guys went to go out to eat some where and told all the people with 2.0 or 1.8 that they werent invited because they werent "true VW drivers"
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM.