Shelby Super Snake vs Nuformz Challenger
true, they should have better brakes...but that can always be upgraded with aftermarket parts. but you're correct. but again, that car can whoop ass and get groceries with the family.
__________________

ok lets finish this.....the brakes should be included with the tune up.
I mean it they can bring it to that powerlevel, it shouldnt be that big of a deal to put some decent brakes on it.
if anyone is willing to pay that much money for a mustang, he surely can spend some more dollars for a brake kit.
I mean it they can bring it to that powerlevel, it shouldnt be that big of a deal to put some decent brakes on it.
if anyone is willing to pay that much money for a mustang, he surely can spend some more dollars for a brake kit.
my ss most likely not. It is set up for drag, so on the turns, my z28 handles better with the stock suspension. I dont know how your car handles so i cant really say. What I will say is not jsut my opinion but a well known fact that fourth gen camaros handled alot better stock to stock than the mustangs of the same era.
upgraded breaks... voided warranty. I guess if you got the money to put out for that car than you dont care about the warranty.
i mean stock for stock . but a cobra is set up for scca races . a gt isnt and v6 are not. but iv never herd or been told that camaros are set up for turns. iv driving alot of them and they feel like boats to me .
__________________
my 0.02 70k on a car with 725hp not a bad price seeing how lambo and ferraries arent even making that and there 4-5 000k and more so as far as that aspect i aggree that its not a bad car either one i would drive but on a secone note 70k for a 725hp with the stopping abilities of sunday church rider is pretty lame through some factory bremboes or something with the stopping power and add it to the price of the car that way you dont get people voiding warranties and complainin because the breaks sucked the car may only cost 55k-60k to build thats an everage profit of 10-12k i think they can afford to through in a better breaking system and a littel better handeling package...just my opinion...
__________________

Built By:Mike Carpenter @ Overdose Performance in Ocala,Fl...
Tuned By: Tony Gannon @ Hp Performance
hp~5!! trq-4!!
doing work!!!!!!

Built By:Mike Carpenter @ Overdose Performance in Ocala,Fl...
Tuned By: Tony Gannon @ Hp Performance
hp~5!! trq-4!!
doing work!!!!!!
you can't compare a mustang and a challenger with a Ferrari or a Lambo.
These cars aren't even close to each other
its not all about the power if you want to compete on track.
and a whobbely 2 tons space cruiser with gnarly brakes isn't realy anything I'd consider as a car capable of doing good lap times.
it is good for getting groceries faster than your neighbour, and that in a straight line.
These cars aren't even close to each other
its not all about the power if you want to compete on track.
and a whobbely 2 tons space cruiser with gnarly brakes isn't realy anything I'd consider as a car capable of doing good lap times.
it is good for getting groceries faster than your neighbour, and that in a straight line.
ok lets finish this.....the brakes should be included with the tune up.
I mean it they can bring it to that powerlevel, it shouldnt be that big of a deal to put some decent brakes on it.
if anyone is willing to pay that much money for a mustang, he surely can spend some more dollars for a brake kit.
I mean it they can bring it to that powerlevel, it shouldnt be that big of a deal to put some decent brakes on it.
if anyone is willing to pay that much money for a mustang, he surely can spend some more dollars for a brake kit.
you are totally right....but that car is still sexy as fuck!
__________________





