So I figure you are in the 62% of dropouts aren't u ZEX? Better taste you say? i think its just a matter of opinion rather than taste......and you probably wont write back because your stupid ricer ass has been shot down too many fucking times you worthless ricer piece of fucking shit. You don't own a V-8 because you can't handle it......fucking ricers don't know the meaning of torque.........

 

hahahahaha SHOT DOWN? 14.7 (stock 5.0)? HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH I CAN RUN THAT!!!! you guys don't read well.... I said stock Mustang 5.0... then I said COBRA SVT, then the SS respectively... SHOT DOWN? HAHAHAHAHAHA AND THAT SVT 12 sec car was running a SUPERCHARGER!!!!
(PLEASE...PLEASE...PLEASE....STOP IT...I CAN'T TAKE ANYMORE *LAUGHING*) You guys should have a SNL show.... serioulsy! Everything I listed was a matter of public record. "Everyone" can see for themselves. I did not mis-state anything. Don't get mad at me when I show everyone a stock 5.0 1/4 mile time... get mad at ford... And that SVT for a big an engine + horsepower...thats ALL it does? zzzzzzzzzz and yes a nicely tuned "import" sounds much better than a Domestic... thats my opinion.... the rest IS FACT... FACT not FICTION....

THE SIMPLE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THIS...AMERICAN ENGINES ARE INEFFICENT.... per liter/HP it is a matter of math not opinion. AND WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME ANY OF YOU RACED AN NSX... if you wanna bash HONDAS... stop picking on the little guy and go after that BIG FISH... Because DSM owners are not afraid of you...

 

Guys, let this idiot go, he's just here to ruffle feathers ... I sincerly hope he isn't being serious with these "facts" he has.

Hell, my 5.0 ran 14.5 when it was stock /w exhaust ... Any year cobra will run a 13 with a descent driver .

Oh, and on your angelfire website info which has absolutely no credibility considering I can go make a webpage there right now I quote this ...

"1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.7 15.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0"

Hmm .. that's a little strange considering those cars are EXACTLY THE SAME! And those times are off as well.

 

good point.........ill leave it alone......he doesnt know wtf hes talkin about...oh yea SS's and Cobras run 14's......good facts.....

 

HEY I got a JOKE for ya.... *stop me if you heard it*

(me): Knock Knock!

(you): who's there?

(me): mustang!

(you): mustang who?

(me): WHAT do you mean MUSTANG WHO?!.....he was back there a minute ago!

hahahahahaha get it.....muwaahahahah

 

Your such a tool. Someone lock this up plzzzz

 

This SO proves your ignorance. My 1.3 liter honda motorcycle puts down more HP to the rear wheel than my VTEC Civic did. So what?

It is a matter of weight and revolving mass. Honda, Toyota, and Mitsu ALL make V8 motors why don't they put them in a car? Because they are JUST AS "inefficient" Hell only Toyota has one over 300 HP and it is in the Titan Truck.

Quit posting while you still have a shread of respect!

 

I guess he has vested interest in this thread, because he was the homo that got rocked in the CRX.

 

The funny thing about our 'inefficient' v8's is that a ls6 makes more HP per liter stock than a civic. You can get 100 HP per liter out of a ls6/ls1 (That's 570 HP for you dropouts) easily, and still put 100,000 miles on the engine. I'd like to see a 1.7 liter civic make that amount of HP and go for more than 1 run at BMP

115HP/1.7L
67HP per liter

405HP/5.7L
71HP

 

http://www.angelfire.com/pa3/ford/performance1.htm

http://www.stevenericgetz.com/vipers...0JULY%2099.htm

Engine Type 90° V8; cast iron block, aluminum heads, Eaton Gen. IV Roots-type supercharger, 8.0 psi Boost

....on that SVT BTW (it was supercharged)

GO to the links... and see a third party test..of all the vehicles... the numbers speak for themselves... your cars arent as fast as you think.... secondly (the import times are slower) no doubt....

Consider this: do they make the engines smaller: because of lack of engineering? or because: in JAPAN they have stricter POLLUTION LAWS.... smaller streets, and streets with more turns that straight aways? So therefore you get a smaller car with, higher MPG, performance based, designed for longivity, and style. It makes perfect sense... The engineering is top notch... and it lasts forever... you can put 200k on nearly any import.....most mustangs more than 10 years old (more than 80k) need to be put out to pasture....that goes for many US cars.

Japan makes very good cars... that keep up with nearly any US car... boosted, sprayed, blown, whatever.... and with fewer cylinders....just admit that you have issues with Japan not the cars... youre a racist... not a critic

I can tell youre a racist by all of the mud slinging... rather than address my (factual) claims piont by point...