Subaru Tech All We'll Drive

Evo On The Dyno Today!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
722ish's Avatar
Thread Starter
ASM FTW!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by TampaWRX
Putting 3 more pounds through the motor and only picking up 15whp is extremely bad times. I seriously doubt you'll see a number like that from a car that's properly tuned. Still, it's nice to think a car with 22psi makes less whp than my humble little commuter at 17.5.

: its bad times
__________________
95 Supra Turbo 6 speed
11 SWP STI sedan
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 08:40 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
Sam@Coastal's Avatar
Does not race from a roll
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Default

yea but turn up the boost, a little spray, some exhaust parts and 11.90's here we come on the EVO's. I love the car I just hate the fact that the wheels will fall off of them in 2 or 3 years...LOL
__________________
www.coastaldyno.com


Smackin down LS1s since 99', LQ4s too...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
722ish's Avatar
Thread Starter
ASM FTW!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Default

11.90's on the 16 g? really? i dont know.... i still dont like the front bumper... or the APC-ness taillights... get the VII shit, and your good to go!
plus the active diff, and the 6 sp! then its a better car... i think..

besides, i heard an STi runs 12.60's with turboback and intake! not much, and no nitrous... although the EVO has an iron block... my guess it would stand up to a lot more abuse! the block anyway
__________________
95 Supra Turbo 6 speed
11 SWP STI sedan
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2003 | 01:32 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
Jordan Y.'s Avatar
15 seconds EXHILARATION
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,801
Likes: 0
Default

Hmm, that number kinda stinks compared to a lot of the numbers I've been seeing.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 07:57 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
ZDriver96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by TampaWRX
They run 19.5 stock and make 270 claimed bhp, which should equate to around ~230whp.
Your using a 15% drivetrain loss calculation when you should be use a 27.5%.
So he should put 200 stock..
Just like the rex's put 163 stock.

Yeah somethings wrong with that car. Hopefully he gets it worked out.
joys of modding
__________________

96 M6 Arctic White Z28
"SLOW LT1"
Blue 2005 Acura TSX
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
722ish's Avatar
Thread Starter
ASM FTW!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by ZDriver96
Your using a 15% drivetrain loss calculation when you should be use a 27.5%.
So he should put 200 stock..
Just like the rex's put 163 stock.

Yeah somethings wrong with that car. Hopefully he gets it worked out.
joys of modding
Ive seen/heard of DSM's losing far less than 27.5%... i think AMS's GVR4 which has a 4g63 like a talon/eclipse/laser, and is also AWD saw 18%.... i dont think the Mitsu awd is anything like a subaru....
obviously, transverse vs. longitudinally mounted 4 cyl
__________________
95 Supra Turbo 6 speed
11 SWP STI sedan
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 PM.