General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Ford dumping spark plugs in favor of focused light?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
KrazyRider83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fawkin Skittles
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Default Ford dumping spark plugs in favor of focused light?

In a breakthrough that may make vehicle starting issues due to fouled plugs or inclement weather a thing of the past, engineers at Ford have reportedly teamed with scientists at Liverpool University to develop a laser beam ignition system to replace ye olde spark plug. The researchers claim their technology is more efficient, more reliable, and it will enable vehicles to start easier in extreme temperatures and damp climates.
Unlike traditional spark plugs (invented way back in 1839 by Edmond Berger), laser light may be split into multiple beams distributing ignition points within the cylinders – not just at the tip of the plug. This not only aids combustion, it also lowers emissions during cold starts. Researchers also point out that the lasers use less energy than their spark plug counterparts, eliminate wear items and wires (fiber optics will carry the laser beam to the cylinders), and improve fuel burn by "watching" ignition from within the combustion chamber and sending messages back to the ECU to adjust fuel mixtures, timing, and ignition.
Ford is expected to introduce the technology in its top models within the next few years, and then make it more widely available
Gentlemen, Start Your Lasers: Ford dumping spark plugs in favor of focused light?
__________________
04 Neon SRT - (rebuild time)
03 B5.5 Passat Wagon 1.8T

Originally Posted by efficientkiller
none of this really matters at the end of the day...if you really want to know, the true answer is found in research, why post a ignorant thread & call it a debate? this is exactly why TR gets the critizism it does...
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Buri3d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Default

Sounds good to me. Just another Inefficient setup thats being reworked in modern vehicles. Now if they just could do something about the gas tank....
__________________
"Throttle till you see light, then brake like HELL!!"


My Last.fm Top 20:
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
Orion ZyGarian's Avatar
7M 2JZ bird in pear tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,532
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buri3d
Sounds good to me. Just another Inefficient setup thats being reworked in modern vehicles. Now if they just could do something about the gas tank....
I hope you're joking

There's an extremely little amount to gain in the spark area of engines. The biggest advantage this would have is individual combustion chamber monitoring, which BMW uses through the spark plug on the M5 for instance. Unless this eliminates the ignition coil, which I doubt, the only wear part its replacing on modern cars is the spark plug itself, which is quite simply the least expensive part to replace.

I dont see big changes ahead, even if it DOES work. How expensive are these stupid things, and are they still as easy to replace as spark plugs?
__________________

ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
KrazyRider83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fawkin Skittles
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Default

i'm sure it'll be expensive and a PITA to change
__________________
04 Neon SRT - (rebuild time)
03 B5.5 Passat Wagon 1.8T

Originally Posted by efficientkiller
none of this really matters at the end of the day...if you really want to know, the true answer is found in research, why post a ignorant thread & call it a debate? this is exactly why TR gets the critizism it does...
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:58 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
zzz's Avatar
zzz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

who gives a fuck its lazer beemz pew pew
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
BrokeMofugga's Avatar
Resident Idiot
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zzz
who gives a fuck its lazer beemz pew pew
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 08:57 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
HoosierDaddy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zzz
who gives a fuck its lazer beemz pew pew
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
Drivermod03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,161
Likes: 0
Default

@ the laser noise
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #9 (permalink)  
LuckyH's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Default

I can attest that Ford cant even align body panels correctly. They changed the heads in my car in 08 because spark plugs were known to break off and get stuck when trying to replace them. They need to step the fuck away from lasers before they kill someone
__________________
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #10 (permalink)  
Orion ZyGarian's Avatar
7M 2JZ bird in pear tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,532
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LuckyH
I can attest that Ford cant even align body panels correctly. They changed the heads in my car in 08 because spark plugs were known to break off and get stuck when trying to replace them. They need to step the fuck away from lasers before they kill someone
Really? Damn. Do you have forced induction? Whats the factory torque spec on the heads?
__________________

ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 PM.