View Single Post
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 08:11 AM
  #37 (permalink)  
Ph34r's Avatar
Ph34r
ΔxΔp ≥ h
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by juiced2ndgenteg
I also want to make it absolutely clear, I DO NOT WORK FOR OR WITH GLEN. I JUST FEEL THE SAME WAY AS HE DOES WHEN IT COMES TO ROM TUNES AND MAF sensors
Good call clearing that up, lol.

As for the results of your dyno testing, I thank you. So what I see, and correct me if I am wrong, is that ROM tunes make sufficient, safe and stable moderate power for under $500. But for an additional $1200-$1500 you can make an additional 64hp and 19 torques? While in the "pro" game this might sound like a good idea for a competitive edge, in the real world modifying a stock ECU that requires minimal invasive modifications in order to make a significant gain is a much better plan for your car and your wallet.

I am not knocking stand alone tuning or your ability to make the power gains that you claim, and I don't think anyone was doing that. Mostly we are commenting on Glen and his outrageous, over the top claims. If ROM tuning was so dangerous and unstable, how come we have so many happy customers and so much repeat business?
__________________