Hell, I think your problem along with a few other people here is wanting too much from too little.

One of the rules they taught me at my family's shop is that anything more than 2HP/CuIn is going to be trouble. A lot of people here are verifying that fact so I'm planning on keeping it concervative.

I will be happy just to get 400 HP at the back wheels, whereas it only had 400 at the crank when I bought it. Just in case though I will be adding a large enough supplemental injector to take me up to the low 500s if the cams and head work will easily allow it.

That will not be too much of a push for 3.3 L. I can't afford to break my crank or engine cases, but everything else ie pretty much expendable.

With all that and a lower gear I hope that the 1/4 mile time should become very respectable. With most of my weight on the back wheels it should be interesting.

 

What I am trying to say is, if he get the ratio down to 12 to 1 it will make more power..unless Turbo Hondas are different.

 

but you said lean it out. hjow will leaning it out get it to 12:1 levi /

you lose again.


porsch guy.

i got sick of replacing shit from the flywheel back. i'm upgrading my drivetrain.

 

Its clear to me that you just like to argue..but it should run better with a 12 to 1 ratio.


Instead of reading the whole post I wrote, you only noticed I made a mistake with using that word, but its clear I know where max power can be made.

Just take a break...