supercharged?
sadly to say , the one in pic isnt mine. (no access to a scanner
) but i think mine is equally as nice. it was out on sat.
__________________
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
::cough:: turbo ::cough::
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...

hmm how would i go about that one? and would it be any cheaper/easier?
__________________
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
easier...depends. cheaper, in the long run, YES!
the pro's i see of turbos:
1. lots of people rebuild turbos around here, dont see very many supercharger repair shops probably because alot of companies such as Vortech do inhouse rebuilds as they own the patent.
2. boost is easily adjustable on a turbo, no swapping pulleys, just pressing a button, or turning a nob.
3. you retain your NA driving and are only in boost when you want to be (saves alot on gas)
4. most turbo's operate above 70% efficiency...highest ive seen a supercharger advertised for? around 55%.
5. i dont like the idea of taking away power to get power (more belts, more pulleys, more mass the motor is trying to turn)
in general i just like the characteristics of a turbo application for streetability. now if you have a cam in there, i would suggest taking it out and find something with as little valve overlap as possible...think lotsa lift, not alot of duration...maybe 114-116LSA
EDIT* i just saw you had a carb, it would be worthwhile to look for a good blowthrough carb as i am not sure how a turbo setup would acted on a carbed application.
the pro's i see of turbos:
1. lots of people rebuild turbos around here, dont see very many supercharger repair shops probably because alot of companies such as Vortech do inhouse rebuilds as they own the patent.
2. boost is easily adjustable on a turbo, no swapping pulleys, just pressing a button, or turning a nob.
3. you retain your NA driving and are only in boost when you want to be (saves alot on gas)
4. most turbo's operate above 70% efficiency...highest ive seen a supercharger advertised for? around 55%.
5. i dont like the idea of taking away power to get power (more belts, more pulleys, more mass the motor is trying to turn)
in general i just like the characteristics of a turbo application for streetability. now if you have a cam in there, i would suggest taking it out and find something with as little valve overlap as possible...think lotsa lift, not alot of duration...maybe 114-116LSA
EDIT* i just saw you had a carb, it would be worthwhile to look for a good blowthrough carb as i am not sure how a turbo setup would acted on a carbed application.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...

Guest
Posts: n/a
A turbo setup on a carbed motor, even with a blowthrough is extreemly detailed and not very easy.
A large turbo would hardly be streetable, and a small turbo with a large motor would be impractical.
A supercharger would be much more streetable. Just my personal opinion however. Supercharger setups are move available, and most likely less expensive, with great results.
A large turbo would hardly be streetable, and a small turbo with a large motor would be impractical.
A supercharger would be much more streetable. Just my personal opinion however. Supercharger setups are move available, and most likely less expensive, with great results.
im have to go with jeff on this one...as i dont know how a turbo would act on a carbed motor, in this situation i would say tried and true is the best course of action. if it was fuel injected, id say go turbo.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch
Yea, that about sums it up...

hmm i think youre right chronic, plus i love the whistle of a supercharger
__________________
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.


