ask tim questions/ advice thread.
you never answered my last questions
__________________

if you havent been in a small plane its worst, cause your eyes and brain say we are moving and your body says oh no we are not. eyes and brain go asshole we are moving, cant you see? body says fuck you we are not moving at all. so they fight and fight and eventualy your body says, you know what fuck you brain, see if you can stop this!! then you throw up.

if you havent been in a small plane its worst, cause your eyes and brain say we are moving and your body says oh no we are not. eyes and brain go asshole we are moving, cant you see? body says fuck you we are not moving at all. so they fight and fight and eventualy your body says, you know what fuck you brain, see if you can stop this!! then you throw up.
but since that guys so frail and skinny and shit, aids wouldnt take too much longer to finish him off.
then, id make a raft out of the tire fort, and float to safety
even 20 years ago it seemed impossible to have a black president, and now we do. since america sucks, theres no way we could make that much progress in that short amount of time, so i figure it was rigged to show that it doesnt matter what color the president is, hes still just a figurehead for a bunch of old white pussies, so it doesnt matter at all.
What do you think of the swagger wagon?
YouTube - Toyota Sienna - Swagger Wagon TOYOTA RAP
YouTube - Toyota Sienna - Swagger Wagon TOYOTA RAP
You might need Chris' help for this one. But on one of my long boring rides to Clearwater to work on my new house this week I got to wondering...
If there is a point (what is it) that "speeding" is actually more fuel efficient. Hear me out. The cost (consumption) of fuel is determined by time and velocity (holding all other variables equal). If you go slow, you use less gas but it costs time. The problem is that time, also costs gas because you're burning it for the duration. So at what point, does your velocity cost so little time that the extra gas used to achieve said velocity relative to the shorter duration make "speeding" more fuel efficient?
If there is a point (what is it) that "speeding" is actually more fuel efficient. Hear me out. The cost (consumption) of fuel is determined by time and velocity (holding all other variables equal). If you go slow, you use less gas but it costs time. The problem is that time, also costs gas because you're burning it for the duration. So at what point, does your velocity cost so little time that the extra gas used to achieve said velocity relative to the shorter duration make "speeding" more fuel efficient?
but, i do know that driving fast is awesome, so i usually just do that.
That's my strategy as well...your answer has merit. I am not smart enough to solve this either, and I fucking hate math. I feel like I could do it, but it could be a couple years before I return with an answer.
Somewhat related, my bike has some sort of crazy ghost issue unless I have a 1/3 a tank of gas, and even then it'll still mess up but runs much better. So I just put 1.5 gallons in and make a stop or two on the way down. I GPS'd it on my phone on one fuel run, and my average cruising speed was 109mph and I went 52.8 miles on that gallon. Pretty boss.
Somewhat related, my bike has some sort of crazy ghost issue unless I have a 1/3 a tank of gas, and even then it'll still mess up but runs much better. So I just put 1.5 gallons in and make a stop or two on the way down. I GPS'd it on my phone on one fuel run, and my average cruising speed was 109mph and I went 52.8 miles on that gallon. Pretty boss.
__________________
2008 R1 | 2004 ///M3
2008 R1 | 2004 ///M3



