Mitsubishi Tech AWD and all things DSM Central

AWD from a roll.

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 02:47 AM
  #21 (permalink)  
AcmeVR6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Default



Sweet anyone who wants to take me for a spin is more than welcome to! I do want to do some autoxing at some point with the car though.... Hmmmm...
__________________
*VIEW MY WEB PAGE!*

If I knew then what I know now it would have ruined everything.

Watching as the world proves me right.
AIM - AcmeVW
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2001 | 04:30 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
M&M's Avatar
M&M
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

I dont have AWD but I will take you for a ride. I have a super duper 16g

------------------
Manny 97 GS-T


<FONT COLOR=#a8a8a8 SIZE=1 FACE=Verdana Arial>This message has been edited by M&M on 02-19-2001 at 08:32 PM</font>
__________________
Manny 97 GS-T
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 07:30 AM
  #23 (permalink)  
TealTalon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Default

Ill take you for another ride when Im making some HP Acme. That was weak. According to HP calculators 270HP to the wheels.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 08:15 AM
  #24 (permalink)  
16gAWD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

Some how that HP calculator thinks Im doing 374 at the wheels

------------------

James
16gAWD
97 Talon TSI AWD
60 times: 1.6x on 17 Goodyear RS-As
Movies
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/Jamesfull.MPG
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_and_BMW.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_t_type.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_BMW.mpg
__________________
James
-------------------------
Just another unreliable fast DSM
http://www27.brinkster.com/awd16g/
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 10:19 AM
  #25 (permalink)  
4sfed 4's Avatar
4SFED4
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Use the mph based calculators. The ET based ones will be way off especially with an AWD car.

Try this site:
http://www.smokemup.com/utilities/calc/hp_mph.cfm

According to this calc Mad Max makes 208 wheel hp. On the dyno it made 203 hp. Pretty close.

------------------
Larry
2000 Nissan Maxima SE 5 speed Mad Max
14.38 @ 96.62 (2.13) - 203 hp/191 ft lb on Spec Rs Dynojet

1985 Dodge Omni GLH Turbo - 4SFED
Breaking engine in.....
__________________
Larry
2002 MB C320 Sport Wagon 15.4@91
2002 Dodge Neon SE
1991 Dodge Spirit R/T-12.3@117 (at 368 whp) Now 500 whp / 514 ft lb on pump gas
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 10:22 AM
  #26 (permalink)  
4sfed 4's Avatar
4SFED4
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by "Someone"

Originally posted by TealTalon:
Ill take you for another ride when Im making some HP Acme. That was weak. According to HP calculators 270HP to the wheels.
Have you got the timing fixed Aaron? Mad Max is ready to get spanked by the claimed 270 hp.



------------------
Larry
2000 Nissan Maxima SE 5 speed Mad Max
14.38 @ 96.62 (2.13) - 203 hp/191 ft lb on Spec Rs Dynojet

1985 Dodge Omni GLH Turbo - 4SFED
Breaking engine in.....
__________________
Larry
2002 MB C320 Sport Wagon 15.4@91
2002 Dodge Neon SE
1991 Dodge Spirit R/T-12.3@117 (at 368 whp) Now 500 whp / 514 ft lb on pump gas
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 10:30 AM
  #27 (permalink)  
TealTalon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Default

Bleh. Turbo is smoking. No racing for me. Many things to fix/Upgrade. See https://www.tamparacing.com/ubb-impo...ML/001432.html
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 10:33 AM
  #28 (permalink)  
16gAWD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

The one DSMs use has ET & MPH. http://www.dsm.org/tools/calchp.htm

But I tried it anyways to see.
324 HP at the wheels. 404 HP at the crank. Sounds much better.

3500# car
111 mph car 1/4
88 mph 1/8

Not bad. Too bad my turbo is only supported up to 340 HP.

------------------

James
16gAWD
97 Talon TSI AWD
60 times: 1.6x on 17 Goodyear RS-As
Movies
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/Jamesfull.MPG
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_and_BMW.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_t_type.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_BMW.mpg
__________________
James
-------------------------
Just another unreliable fast DSM
http://www27.brinkster.com/awd16g/
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 01:02 PM
  #29 (permalink)  
4sfed 4's Avatar
4SFED4
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by "Someone"

Originally posted by 16gAWD:
The one DSMs use has ET & MPH. http://www.dsm.org/tools/calchp.htm

But I tried it anyways to see.
324 HP at the wheels. 404 HP at the crank. Sounds much better.

3500# car
111 mph car 1/4
88 mph 1/8

Not bad. Too bad my turbo is only supported up to 340 HP.
Whew! 3500 lb! Yikes....I thought Mad Max was a pig at 3400 lb with me in it (3550 with gas). Are the 2gs alot heavier than the 1gs? I think EMODSMs weighed under 3000 lb (without him in it).



------------------
Larry
2000 Nissan Maxima SE 5 speed Mad Max
14.38 @ 96.62 (2.13) - 203 hp/191 ft lb on Spec Rs Dynojet

1985 Dodge Omni GLH Turbo - 4SFED
Breaking engine in.....
__________________
Larry
2002 MB C320 Sport Wagon 15.4@91
2002 Dodge Neon SE
1991 Dodge Spirit R/T-12.3@117 (at 368 whp) Now 500 whp / 514 ft lb on pump gas
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2001 | 02:30 PM
  #30 (permalink)  
16gAWD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

2Gs are a little bit wider. Plus I have ever damn heavy weight option you can get. Leather/power seats Airbags and other safety equipement plus I heavier than both of them but not by much.

------------------

James
16gAWD
97 Talon TSI AWD
60 times: 1.6x on 17 Goodyear RS-As
Movies
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/Jamesfull.MPG
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_and_BMW.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_t_type.mpg
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ray/James_vs_BMW.mpg
__________________
James
-------------------------
Just another unreliable fast DSM
http://www27.brinkster.com/awd16g/
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 AM.