Looking into - '93 Eclipse GS 2.0 dohc
if your doing an even trade in on your car for the eclipse, id keep your car and look else where. these cars arent worth very much, im sure you would be able to sell your car somewhere and buy two n/a eclipse. even with your high mileage, you should still be able to get far more for that then the eclipse. how much are they asking for it if you dont mind telling?
__________________

FOR A WOUNDED MAN SHALL SAY TO HIS ASSAILANT
'IF I LIVE, I WILL KILL YOU. IF I DIE, YOU ARE FORGIVEN'
SUCH IS THE RULE OF HONOUR.

FOR A WOUNDED MAN SHALL SAY TO HIS ASSAILANT
'IF I LIVE, I WILL KILL YOU. IF I DIE, YOU ARE FORGIVEN'
SUCH IS THE RULE OF HONOUR.
That one you have pictured looks amazing, you usually don't find them in that good of a condition and with very low mileage. Looks like it was well taken care of.
Last edited by WhiteFwdsm; Jul 3, 2007 at 02:37 PM.
In any event, your Volvo still has a better power to weight ratio.
__________________
if your doing an even trade in on your car for the eclipse, id keep your car and look else where. these cars arent worth very much, im sure you would be able to sell your car somewhere and buy two n/a eclipse. even with your high mileage, you should still be able to get far more for that then the eclipse. how much are they asking for it if you dont mind telling?
__________________
My first car was a 1990 Eclipse GS. I loved the car. All I did was replace the timing belts and rebuilt the head (it had 150k on the motor) and the car ran beautiful. I was fairly quick. Yes, the car does weigh 2700 lbs. All owners manuals show the weight of the car, plus the average male (which is about 200lbs). They have a 4g63 engine in them, so even if you wanna do some mods to it, they are easy to do. The only complaint I had about the car was that it felt a little light in the rear end when coming around a corner at a faster rate of speed, but I didnt have any suspension upgrades. I have to say that I loved the car. I think its a good buy.




1990 GS-T