Ripped on a RX-8....
Guest
Posts: n/a
P|20bl3m \^/17h 7h3 c4|2 15 7h47 du3 70 7h3 |2>< d351g|\|4710|\|, 17 \^/1ll 4l\^/4y5 b3 c0mp4|23d 70 7h3 |2><7 4|\|d b3 7h0ugh7 0f 45 4 |2><7 |23pl4c3m3|\|7 70 7h3 g3|\|3|24l publ1c. 4|\|d 45 5uch, 17 15 fuck1|\|g 5l0\^/ 4|\|d h45 l177l3 p073|\|714l c0mp4|23d 70 7h3 p|23v10u5 |2><7. |2074|2y |\|/4 m070|25 |\|33d |234lly l1gh7 ch45515, much 1|\| 7h3 \^/4y h0|\|d4 m070|25 d0, du3 70 l4ck 0f 70|2qu3. 1f 7h15 7h1|\|g 15 5upp053d 70 b3 1|\| 7h3 54m3 cl455 45 7h3 4l71m4 3.5, \^/h1ch \^/0uld 1 |247h3|2 "d|21v3" 3v3|2y d4y? 50m37h1|\|g \^/17h 50m3 f|234k1|\| 70|2qu3 0ff 7h3 l1|\|3, \^/h1ch 7h3 |2><8 h45 |\|0|\|3 0f. |\|0\^/ 1f y0u'|23 ch0051|\|g 4 c4|2 70 h17 7h3 7\^/157135 \^/17h, 1 5upp053 17 \^/0uld b3 4 p|2377y g00d ch01c3, bu7 7h475 4b0u7 17.
All I know is I was catching third gear @ 65 to 70 mph..with a passenger in the car, the car was still new with only 30 miles, so power wiould be more with more of a break in.And without a doubt will do 100 mph in the quarter mile. All the engine needs is a nice intake and a header setup, and you will be right into 13s all day long.
__________________
custom parts is our perfection.
custom parts is our perfection.
this car has the same limitations its always had: way too pollutive for standard emissions controls... which means they have to load it up w/ ample emissions control equipment like Smog pumps and ACV's and extra cats and what not. If this car came w/ a less restrictive exhaust and free flowing intake, i wouldnt be suprised to see this car meet or exceed the car's original rated HP levels.
its obviously cleaner burning than the old 13B's but, its still a rotary and has way more nooks and crannies for unburned hydrocarbons to fester than a normal piston engine.
172 RWHP is waaaaaaaaaay too little for as heavy as the car is... i dont recall what it weighs but i know it sho aint no 2700 lbs like a nicely equipped FC. im willing to bet my FC puts out that much power right now... honestly, the RX8 wasnt at all what i had hoped for... just like how the Chevy Malibu and Impala arent even shells of their former selves... they arent even RWD for christ's sake...they should at least rename them and try not to milk the car's heritage for all its worth.
its obviously cleaner burning than the old 13B's but, its still a rotary and has way more nooks and crannies for unburned hydrocarbons to fester than a normal piston engine.
172 RWHP is waaaaaaaaaay too little for as heavy as the car is... i dont recall what it weighs but i know it sho aint no 2700 lbs like a nicely equipped FC. im willing to bet my FC puts out that much power right now... honestly, the RX8 wasnt at all what i had hoped for... just like how the Chevy Malibu and Impala arent even shells of their former selves... they arent even RWD for christ's sake...they should at least rename them and try not to milk the car's heritage for all its worth.
__________________
DID U SAY 172HP ON A STOCK port N/A FC? wow! i gotta see it....
hey i just got a thing in the mail that says i can go test drive an rx-8 and get a gift soon after...... im goin as soon as possible.... and supposedly the rx8 makes about 235hp opposed to the fd 230hp i think i may stand corrected.. for an n/a its got impressive numbers i think even though they said it made 250hp on the 6-speed. but i think its a stylish family car with decent power.. id definately buy it if i had a family and the money! lol
and quickcivic... high 13's or low 14's is fast for a stock car..... did ur civic come stock with n e thing close to those kind of numbers ? nuff said...
corvette z06's only get mid range 12's stock... is that not fast?
my car is slow and im not gonna lie but u gotta give respect where respect is needed....
i have a friend that works at mazda on florida and he drove the rx8 and said "its slow down bottom and up top has decent power but the car looks bad ass inside and out".... and he does have a resonably fast car thatz in the 11's so i knew hed give me an accurate response.. well im done peace
jack
hey i just got a thing in the mail that says i can go test drive an rx-8 and get a gift soon after...... im goin as soon as possible.... and supposedly the rx8 makes about 235hp opposed to the fd 230hp i think i may stand corrected.. for an n/a its got impressive numbers i think even though they said it made 250hp on the 6-speed. but i think its a stylish family car with decent power.. id definately buy it if i had a family and the money! lol
and quickcivic... high 13's or low 14's is fast for a stock car..... did ur civic come stock with n e thing close to those kind of numbers ? nuff said...

corvette z06's only get mid range 12's stock... is that not fast?
my car is slow and im not gonna lie but u gotta give respect where respect is needed....
i have a friend that works at mazda on florida and he drove the rx8 and said "its slow down bottom and up top has decent power but the car looks bad ass inside and out".... and he does have a resonably fast car thatz in the 11's so i knew hed give me an accurate response.. well im done peace
jack
__________________

image removed from your sig...see forum rules

image removed from your sig...see forum rules
Last edited by seventhgear; Oct 27, 2003 at 08:39 PM.
Yes, But the 6 speed RX8 was rated @ 250 @ the crank, right?
The part that made the FD fast was the 200 plus lbs of torque it has..
Well let me say this...
The books rate my MP3 @ 110 hp @ the wheels, and claim a 16.5 ET..The MP3 weights 3100 lbs with me and some gas.
I drove the car bone stock and pulled a 16.04..stock...So am I a awesome driver, better than the magazines guys...I don't think so. If anything they are better @ getting the most out of a test car. So why was I able to pull a 16.04 stock? Thats 1/2 second faster than quoted in every article I can find..So what I am saying is.....The RX8 may be faster with someone else driving..I am not saying I am a good driver.. I was able to get a stock car 1/2 second faster, than a professional driver.....maybe I am in the wrong line of work....
The part that made the FD fast was the 200 plus lbs of torque it has..
Well let me say this...
The books rate my MP3 @ 110 hp @ the wheels, and claim a 16.5 ET..The MP3 weights 3100 lbs with me and some gas.
I drove the car bone stock and pulled a 16.04..stock...So am I a awesome driver, better than the magazines guys...I don't think so. If anything they are better @ getting the most out of a test car. So why was I able to pull a 16.04 stock? Thats 1/2 second faster than quoted in every article I can find..So what I am saying is.....The RX8 may be faster with someone else driving..I am not saying I am a good driver.. I was able to get a stock car 1/2 second faster, than a professional driver.....maybe I am in the wrong line of work....
__________________
custom parts is our perfection.
custom parts is our perfection.
Originally posted by Levi
Yes, But the 6 speed RX8 was rated @ 250 @ the crank, right?
The part that made the FD fast was the 200 plus lbs of torque it has..
Well let me say this...
The books rate my MP3 @ 110 hp @ the wheels, and claim a 16.5 ET..The MP3 weights 3100 lbs with me and some gas.
I drove the car bone stock and pulled a 16.04..stock...So am I a awesome driver, better than the magazines guys...I don't think so. If anything they are better @ getting the most out of a test car. So why was I able to pull a 16.04 stock? Thats 1/2 second faster than quoted in every article I can find..So what I am saying is.....The RX8 may be faster with someone else driving..I am not saying I am a good driver.. I was able to get a stock car 1/2 second faster, than a professional driver.....maybe I am in the wrong line of work....
Yes, But the 6 speed RX8 was rated @ 250 @ the crank, right?
The part that made the FD fast was the 200 plus lbs of torque it has..
Well let me say this...
The books rate my MP3 @ 110 hp @ the wheels, and claim a 16.5 ET..The MP3 weights 3100 lbs with me and some gas.
I drove the car bone stock and pulled a 16.04..stock...So am I a awesome driver, better than the magazines guys...I don't think so. If anything they are better @ getting the most out of a test car. So why was I able to pull a 16.04 stock? Thats 1/2 second faster than quoted in every article I can find..So what I am saying is.....The RX8 may be faster with someone else driving..I am not saying I am a good driver.. I was able to get a stock car 1/2 second faster, than a professional driver.....maybe I am in the wrong line of work....
__________________

-93 MR2, #129 ES
-93 MR2, #129 ES
i wouldnt say my car is @ exactly 172 RWHP... that would put it pretty damn close to the magical 200 crank HP mark... which im quite sure im not at. I would say im more closer to ~160 RWHP w/ the trap speeds i hit... considering i spun all thru 1st gear on a prepped track.
but, you can see the mods for my car. its an SE, which is a base model, just click the link in my sig, and look at my page for the mods.
but, you can see the mods for my car. its an SE, which is a base model, just click the link in my sig, and look at my page for the mods.
__________________
All I know is I lined up with some fag salesmen that was driving one and he did'nt step up to the plate. That was when I had open d/p so he knew I was trying to race btw.
__________________
TR's official early morning bass fishing crew

R.I.P.
2003 Mazda Speed Protege - Black Mica
# 886 out of 1750
1/4 Times
60 2.26 1/8 8.96 mph 82.97 1/4 13.72 mph 103.36
TR's official early morning bass fishing crew
R.I.P.
2003 Mazda Speed Protege - Black Mica
# 886 out of 1750
1/4 Times
60 2.26 1/8 8.96 mph 82.97 1/4 13.72 mph 103.36


