tired of these 9 second stock ls1 short block threads!
tired of these 9 second stock ls1 short block threads!
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...48#post1920448
"For people who have not been following along-
I have a stock short block,stock untouched heads, stock intake manifold,
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block.
TNT F2 nitrous kit jetted to 150."
R/T .014
60' 1.364
1/8 6.118
1/8 mph 112.20
1/4 9.643
1/4 mph 138.39
not bad. i thought only fords could go this fast on stock junk oem parts.
racing at its finest.
"For people who have not been following along-
I have a stock short block,stock untouched heads, stock intake manifold,
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block.
TNT F2 nitrous kit jetted to 150."
R/T .014
60' 1.364
1/8 6.118
1/8 mph 112.20
1/4 9.643
1/4 mph 138.39
not bad. i thought only fords could go this fast on stock junk oem parts.
racing at its finest.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am
1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Originally Posted by 1Bad00SS
What makes you think you could of keep up with me. Have you ever had that car on a dyno?
I have a stock short block,stock untouched heads, stock intake manifold,
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block
That's impressive, almost to the point of being unbelievable
__________________
same car went 10.60s on motor
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am
1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Originally Posted by 1Bad00SS
What makes you think you could of keep up with me. Have you ever had that car on a dyno?
the TNT kits are notoriously under rated. Its probably a little more to the tires. However...the car runs high 10s on motor and is only 3050 lbs roughly. So with an ACTUAL 150-160 rwhp increase from the TNT kit...I can see those gains being had.
__________________
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
damn nice times, BTW i love teh sig jake
__________________
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
Originally posted by Scott
But he did not say stock weight.
I am with BBB on this one.
But he did not say stock weight.
I am with BBB on this one.
There are several other stock shortblock LS1s running mid to high 9s as well. of course they are more setup for strictly drag duty and very light.
At some point I want to get a stock long block with a large cam and see what I can ring out of it. Since we have already done 610-680 rwhp on several stock short blocks...I think 700+ is not out of the question really leaning on it. Sounds like it would be fun. Especially since there is little worry involved. Keep upping the shot till pieces fly
__________________
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
sounds fishy to me too, i mean, a stock ls1 can handle 700 hp, ........ with no mods, as far as valves, valve springs, etc..... ???
sorry, had to add more,
how can he get 700 hp out of the stock fuel system (or most of it) anyway?
sorry, had to add more,
how can he get 700 hp out of the stock fuel system (or most of it) anyway?
__________________
200 points away from a 300
200 points away from a 300