GM Tech - Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Hummer, Pontiac, Saturn Tech Technical Discussion for General Motors Products both past and present

tired of these 9 second stock ls1 short block threads!

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 09:47 AM
  #1 (permalink)  
gator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Underdog
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Default tired of these 9 second stock ls1 short block threads!

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...48#post1920448

"For people who have not been following along-
I have a stock short block,stock untouched heads, stock intake manifold,
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block.

TNT F2 nitrous kit jetted to 150."

R/T .014
60' 1.364
1/8 6.118
1/8 mph 112.20
1/4 9.643
1/4 mph 138.39

not bad. i thought only fords could go this fast on stock junk oem parts.

racing at its finest.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am

Originally Posted by 1Bad00SS
What makes you think you could of keep up with me. Have you ever had that car on a dyno?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #2 (permalink)  
Ian MMF's Avatar
Omnipotence
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,843
Likes: 0
Default

That's not real[/ford guys]
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
BigBadBuick's Avatar
Livin' Large
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Default

I have a stock short block,stock untouched heads, stock intake manifold,
stock injectors,and stock fuel rails.The heads and intake manifold have
NEVER been off the block
AND the kit is only jetted to 150?

That's impressive, almost to the point of being unbelievable
__________________
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 03:31 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
gator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Underdog
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Default

same car went 10.60s on motor
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am

Originally Posted by 1Bad00SS
What makes you think you could of keep up with me. Have you ever had that car on a dyno?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
HybridSS's Avatar
I have fuzzy eyebrows
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,269
Likes: 0
Default

the TNT kits are notoriously under rated. Its probably a little more to the tires. However...the car runs high 10s on motor and is only 3050 lbs roughly. So with an ACTUAL 150-160 rwhp increase from the TNT kit...I can see those gains being had.
__________________

if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
Jakethesnake's Avatar
Bombs over Baghdad...
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by 4drwhore
That's not real[/ford guys]
+1 thats not real lol
__________________
Proud OIF/OEF Veteran and still serving
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
SPLATT's Avatar
TONIGHT....YOU....
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

damn nice times, BTW i love teh sig jake
__________________

"My CaR Are SlOW"
1985 monte carlo SS *under construction*
2002 T/A Firehawk #0490. M6. A few RWHP/ more RWTQ.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 05:45 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
HybridSS's Avatar
I have fuzzy eyebrows
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Scott
But he did not say stock weight.

I am with BBB on this one.
Your with BBB on this one? What is BBB saying? Sounds to me like he said he doesnt belive the shot size. Understandable. I think its a bit more myself. That doesnt change the fact that its still a stock longblock + cam and boltons running mid 9s.

There are several other stock shortblock LS1s running mid to high 9s as well. of course they are more setup for strictly drag duty and very light.


At some point I want to get a stock long block with a large cam and see what I can ring out of it. Since we have already done 610-680 rwhp on several stock short blocks...I think 700+ is not out of the question really leaning on it. Sounds like it would be fun. Especially since there is little worry involved. Keep upping the shot till pieces fly
__________________

if it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast, if it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable, if it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 06:02 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
stangerang's Avatar
whoopdy fucking do!
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Default

sounds fishy to me too, i mean, a stock ls1 can handle 700 hp, ........ with no mods, as far as valves, valve springs, etc..... ???


sorry, had to add more,


how can he get 700 hp out of the stock fuel system (or most of it) anyway?
__________________
200 points away from a 300
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 AM.