F/I is looking the way to go with the new 5.0 if you want some crazy speed. BBR out of FL just took a stock block 5.0 with a procharger and made some pretty good numbers.

 

There sports cars when u go to get insurance.....

 

It's hard to argue the performance of the new mustang. I still like the camaro look a lot better. Just drive em both and decided that way based on the way they make you feel. Also, post pictures when you get it saying I LOVE TR so we know you aren't trolling

 

5.0 any day of the fucking year dude, GM's cars have gone to shit lately with exception of a few cars. the camaro feels really plastic and cheap, theres almost no feeling of connection to the road when driving one, roadnoise is shit. the average ss1 1/4 is around 13.5 with a decent driver. slow compared to the 5.0's low 12 run. I've test drivin both cars and stang is 1230481740 times better in every way, the chassis is super tight, transmission is great, engine is ridiculous. people are getting the 5.0's into the 10's with bolt ons, a clutch and drags without even having to strip one thing for weight savings.

lets check the interiors

Camaro ss


5.0



thats interiors from both respective trim levels, cmon now

i know the GM guys are having a hard time getting raped this time around, but its time to face the facts this time, Ford takes the cake here. and its cheaper.

and just for fun:


I dont see any camaros still running stock LS3's doing this.

 

^ That is not 2SS interior, which would be comparable to the Mustang interior you posted.

 

the pic had "SS" in the link. lemme see if i can find one.

ahh, here we go, 2SS from the show room floor. looks equally as lame, except for the super cute mini gauges sitting in the area where i would like to put my cell phone.







nice door panal!


as you can clearly see, GM took some inspiration from this fine sony xplod boombox, its been rumored that sony and GM with do a joint venture, packaging the shown boombox with the Camaro 2SS, what a deal!!!

 

Hey, I didn't say it looked better just saying at least give it a fair comparison.

 

Price wise for the two cars it would be comparable

 

^ Agreed. He wasn't talking price in his post though, just comparing interior craftsmanship.

 

So is a 96 Civic, no really.