Cars you would never drive, no matter what...
You want to compare the SI to say the Camaro SS that has 426hp? Apples to Apples right? lol. I'll let you do the math. Who is entertaining who again?
-Mark
__________________
98' cobra
98' cobra
agreed!
id never pay money for any of the following, even if its just a rental car;
any geo
any daewoo
any kia
any hyundai
any neon
chrysler 300
plymouth k car
any civic
cavalier
v6 mustang
v6 camaro
just about any mitsubishi
any jeep
astro
aerostar
windstar
exploder
saturn, except maybe a sky
cressida
tercel
corsica
tempo
escort
taurus
hhr
pt cruiser
.........ummm, maybe the list of what i would spend money on would be easier?
id never pay money for any of the following, even if its just a rental car;
any geo
any daewoo
any kia
any hyundai
any neon
chrysler 300
plymouth k car
any civic
cavalier
v6 mustang
v6 camaro
just about any mitsubishi
any jeep
astro
aerostar
windstar
exploder
saturn, except maybe a sky
cressida
tercel
corsica
tempo
escort
taurus
hhr
pt cruiser
.........ummm, maybe the list of what i would spend money on would be easier?

WHOA!!! i beat the dick out of my tercel! i mean really, beat the shit out of it. its an awesome dd.
__________________
__________________


By your math: 22lbs * 140hp = 3080 lbs. I think your math is off.
Lets think about this:
Power to Weight
That means, power / Weight
Power-to-weight ratio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dont argue math with an engineer.


USDM Civic Si = Top Model.
i don't want to get into this arguement but i agree with you bitemark, sorry there fox but he is making more sense. you can't compare a base model car to a mid or high level model. i.e. your SI to the v6. base model to base model the p2w ratio goes to the 6er's. i'm not defending the 6, i really would never drive one when they make a 8 with more power for a few more dollars. but really bitemark wins this arguement.
__________________





