Oh how things are changing
.I like it. Pretty cool. The styling is sharp. But I'd like to see a return to roots. Why does EVERYTHING have to be managed by a computer on this car? I mean, the computer systems are there to compensate for suspension systems and a drive-train that can't operate effectively without it. Right? To me its a handicap if it "needs" these computer controlled devices just to perform. I'm not talking about engine management so much as I am talking about traction and suspension systems.
Same with cars, if it needs to have brains controlling everything, than its sort of lame.
thats my 2 cents.
Okay I'm babbling now, sorry.
Same with cars, if it needs to have brains controlling everything, than its sort of lame.
thats my 2 cents.
Okay I'm babbling now, sorry.
.I like it. Pretty cool. The styling is sharp. But I'd like to see a return to roots. Why does EVERYTHING have to be managed by a computer on this car? I mean, the computer systems are there to compensate for suspension systems and a drive-train that can't operate effectively without it. Right? To me its a handicap if it "needs" these computer controlled devices just to perform. I'm not talking about engine management so much as I am talking about traction and suspension systems.
Like the F-117 stealth fighter, without computers to manage its flight systems the thing can't fly at all! I'll take a WWII P-51 Mustang over a stealth fighter any day, The P-51's shear mechanical design principals are what makes it so much more amazing to me, far more amazing than a modern state of the art, but computer dependent F-117.
Same with cars, if it needs to have brains controlling everything, than its sort of lame.
thats my 2 cents.
Okay I'm babbling now, sorry.
Like the F-117 stealth fighter, without computers to manage its flight systems the thing can't fly at all! I'll take a WWII P-51 Mustang over a stealth fighter any day, The P-51's shear mechanical design principals are what makes it so much more amazing to me, far more amazing than a modern state of the art, but computer dependent F-117.
Same with cars, if it needs to have brains controlling everything, than its sort of lame.
thats my 2 cents.
Okay I'm babbling now, sorry.
But I think it's kinda hard to compare cars equiped to the "T" with electronics/cars that are actually controlled via the driver with the aircraft of yesteryear/today because the two are entirely different animals. Pit a P51 against an F15/16/22 (all inferior due to their dependance on electronics based on your argument) and see who wins
Interesting choice on choosing the F117, the AF knows it was a hunk of junk, hence the retirement while it was still young.
But I think it's kinda hard to compare cars equiped to the "T" with electronics/cars that are actually controlled via the driver with the aircraft of yesteryear/today because the two are entirely different animals. Pit a P51 against an F15/16/22 (all inferior due to their dependance on electronics based on your argument) and see who wins
But I think it's kinda hard to compare cars equiped to the "T" with electronics/cars that are actually controlled via the driver with the aircraft of yesteryear/today because the two are entirely different animals. Pit a P51 against an F15/16/22 (all inferior due to their dependance on electronics based on your argument) and see who wins

)What are you basing this off of? while the 51 could hold its own for a pass or two, the 1500hp RR motor is nothing compared to 28,000 lbs/thrust and an air brake that could have the 15 going in any other direction in a hurry. Ive had the honor of seeing the 51 in a low level flight doing maneuvers, but i fail to see anything that could give it a step up on todays aircraft.
i dont see how the amount of maintenance/take off origin makes any difference in a dog fight? once the aircraft is in the air the "spinning" stops and, well, we all know what else stops when that happens


