2003 Cobras Under-Rated By Ford
Guest
Posts: n/a
You GM owners can eat your hearts out !
The 2003 Cobra exploded on the automotive scene with a super-charged 4.6 Liter DOHC V8 engine. Compared to recent SVT Cobras, the 2003 has been labeled "King of the Hill" by auto enthusiasts. Ford claims that the Cobra's engine produces 390 horsepower and 390 ft./lb. of torque.
Now that this new Cobra is finally out on the streets, owners have been taking them in for dynamometer testing. The results--encouraging. Assuming a 16% drivetrain loss with the 6 speed manual transmission, this Cobra should theoretically produce between 325-335 horsepower and torque to the wheels. However, after multiple dynamometer results have been obtained from many different owners, the 2003 Cobra is producing well above Ford's advertised horsepower. Typically these cars are producing between 350-365 horsepower and torque to the wheels. With a 16% drivetrain loss, this equates to 406-423 to the flywheel (engine output). :o :o
The 2003 Cobra exploded on the automotive scene with a super-charged 4.6 Liter DOHC V8 engine. Compared to recent SVT Cobras, the 2003 has been labeled "King of the Hill" by auto enthusiasts. Ford claims that the Cobra's engine produces 390 horsepower and 390 ft./lb. of torque.
Now that this new Cobra is finally out on the streets, owners have been taking them in for dynamometer testing. The results--encouraging. Assuming a 16% drivetrain loss with the 6 speed manual transmission, this Cobra should theoretically produce between 325-335 horsepower and torque to the wheels. However, after multiple dynamometer results have been obtained from many different owners, the 2003 Cobra is producing well above Ford's advertised horsepower. Typically these cars are producing between 350-365 horsepower and torque to the wheels. With a 16% drivetrain loss, this equates to 406-423 to the flywheel (engine output). :o :o
Guest
Posts: n/a
Now, why did Ford under-rate the power of the 2003 Cobra in their advertisements? Some speculate that Ford did not want to experience the same backlash from the false advertising of the 99 Cobra, which produced well under the advertised horsepower and torque. Others say Ford did this to keep insurance costs down for their customers, which in turn would increase sales. Regardless of the reason, the new Cobras are making owners very happy. With over 400 horsepower for $34,000 the 2003 Cobra holds one of the best horsepower to dollar ratios in the automotive industry today.
Ford could care less about how much we pay for insurance. All they care about is how much money they can make. And preventing another 99 fiasco, would save them from spending alot of money fixing cars not producing expected horsepower.
__________________
hopefully so car and driver would pit it against some other cars (ex. the goddamn bmw's they love so damn much) and totally ass rape them while looking all the sweeter.
__________________

Mechanical Engineer - Naval Surface Warfare Center PCD, Marine Corps. Counter IED Development
USF Formula and Baja racing Alumni/Consultant

Mechanical Engineer - Naval Surface Warfare Center PCD, Marine Corps. Counter IED Development
USF Formula and Baja racing Alumni/Consultant
Originally posted by Force Fed 23
I can't believe 30hp would have had a drastic difference in insurance rates. Maybe its the first reason about the 99 Cobra fiasco.
I can't believe 30hp would have had a drastic difference in insurance rates. Maybe its the first reason about the 99 Cobra fiasco.
Originally posted by black91gt5.0
hopefully so car and driver would pit it against some other cars (ex. the goddamn bmw's they love so damn much) and totally ass rape them while looking all the sweeter.
hopefully so car and driver would pit it against some other cars (ex. the goddamn bmw's they love so damn much) and totally ass rape them while looking all the sweeter.
I heard that in bad wheater the Cobra doesn't run so well. A friend of mine said that when he went to the track on a hot day(Brandenton) He said the 03' Cobra's were running low to mid 13's. Is there any truth to that statement about poor performance in bad wheather?


