How bad is this for the engine?
Guest
Posts: n/a
The O2's should compensate for quite a bit of richness. I think the EEC can correct 20% if I'm not mistaken, thats ALOT of fuel. Even without the blower, it shouldn't run THAT rich unless someone fucked up the tune, because it will still measure the actual air volume amount and inject fuel accordingly.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
well...
I just bought the car and it's running GREAT. As for 0 torque... the low compression is compensated nicely by the other bajillion mods on it. If I had to predict a quarter mile time for it as is I'd say somewhere in the high 14's. Not bad for all motor and low compression pistons. I've fiddled with the fuel pressure and in the end I set it back to the way the seller had it. It just did 400+ miles back to my house problem free. However, it's raining now so I guess it's time to find out if the convertible top leaks or not =] (I did put a hose to it at the guys house, but mother nature is far more devious than me and a garden hose.)
Well, I'm now a proud owner of a Ford again. Time to change my forum name... it's missing 4 cylinders =]
Well, I'm now a proud owner of a Ford again. Time to change my forum name... it's missing 4 cylinders =]
__________________
1994 Mustang GT Convertible
8.5:1 pistons... but no power adder... yet.
1994 Mustang GT Convertible
8.5:1 pistons... but no power adder... yet.
