Okay folks research time! Straight out of the july 1999 issue of road and track:
Bmw m3: 1/4 is 14.2 sec
Dinan Supercharged m3: 13.5 in the 1/4.

There Dont flame me flame road and track.

My money is on the kult either way.

 

oh yeah forgot this vital stat
Top speed once again from the same issue of road and track:
m3: 137 (electronically limited)
dinan m3: 157

 

ah and there it is the true facts...you might want to learn bt your own words and do some research before you make those statements.....so how does that foot taste you know the one in your mouth

------------------
Somebody Set Up Us The Bomb.

 

You must be looking at something different then what I am. 1999 BMW m3. From the official webpage and links off of it. Quarter mile time 13.6 Dinan Series with all options 12 Flat. These are accurate statistics its just rediculous how you find page to page different info. Oh and just to add to that when the BMW takes a 90degree turn at 90mph and sticks to the road like glue gaining in speed and when the honda tries to take it and flips over...come talk to me. THey are faster cars look better and handle better.

------------------
How low can you go gutting Crixs sure makes me sick especially when you still lose. Fact: 9 out of 10 Hondas arent worth my gas.
www.reactiveracing.f2s.com one of the biggest car clubs locally and nationally growing.

 

like I SAID it was in ROAD AND TRACK. Dont flame me flame them. You want me to scan the goddamn page? Il lbring it this sat IF Im out you tell me whats up then.

 

Bottom line BMW is a better all around car then a Mustang. In speed handling looks everything this is fact not opinion. MAYBE a turbo saleen could hang with an M3 hehe but in most respects BMW has it beat and ya I know there is a huge price difference no offense to any mustang fans 1/2 of you could take me
---and thats the bottom line---