...if he runs rich, and is on the gas alot...i could see 15mpg..maybe a little less...but 7mpg? the damn firebird gets better then that WOT (not really)

 

why is everyone makin it sound bad to get beat by a 5.slow crustang

 

7mpg is kinda bad, you need a new tune. I got 31mpg on 680cc injectors and fully built turbo motor.

scott

 

Im going to go ahead and call BS on 7 MPG

 

i'll 2nd that along with the 320hp he claims to have (due to the fact there is no dyno)

 

Um if you are getting 220 to a full tank that would be 18.6546546254 miles to a gallon.

 

at 7mpg he better hit 7's!!!!

 

vito you are correct on the normal gas mileage but when im beatin on the car a little you can litterally see the gas gauge drop... for example drivin from fletcher and dale mabry, down dale mabry to hillsborough, then hillsborough to basically sheldon, well that cost me a little over a quarter tank beatin on the car about 95% of the way.... and driving back from orlando saturday night i filled up right before i hopped on the interstate and was just about on e by the time i got home... i think it is mostly due to not only my fuel system but the fact that the ecu has no o2 sensor...

and i dont think i claimed to have 320whp as it sits but i did say by the time i dyno it and get it tuned i should be up at 320 with a few more mods... that is my goal on the stock sleeves and thats what i tell most people....

 

this is what i was refering to

(Free-4-All, What do you consider street fast)
that was posted by you was it not? you claimed to have 320hp did you not.. sorry i guess it was a misunderstanding then its all good though bro

 

i was referring more to the weight, i should have been more specific..... i did not mean to imply that those were my current horsepower numbers i was just using that as an example....