The Video Post Check here for the latest videos!

GSX vs M3 LMAO

Thread Tools
 
Old May 11, 2003 | 10:37 AM
  #41 (permalink)  
styles999's Avatar
Powered ByYo Mommas Mouth
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Default

M3 (stock) - 333hp 252 ft-lbs of torque 3415lbs
GSX (stock) - 210hp 214 ft-lbs of torque 3270lbs

Did you think about the weight diffrence? i know its only 145lbs, then add the
2 guys in the gsx about 280lbs(depending) gsx= 3550lbs
1guy in the m3 about 140(depending) m3=3555lbs then add the 150lbs and 120hp in the M3
thats if everyone weighed 140lbs, so id say no contest with the m3 even if he was running shorter gears maybe in the 1/8 mile but not in the 1/4, thats why you buy a light car and do heavy mods to it, but then you wind up with all ass and not enough car
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 11:11 AM
  #42 (permalink)  
Tony's Avatar
Senior Citizen
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you beavis for telling us something we already knew about power to weight...but above about 70..power to weight don't mean very much...hence why 9 second bikes can get pulled by high 11 second cars pretty easily. The M3 prolly still had a higher mph that that GSX, it would have cought him.
__________________
10' 1198S

09' Ninja 500R

09' Stella
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #43 (permalink)  
PoppaSmurf's Avatar
Chowdah-head
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Tripw0l
"My mom's gonna kill me" Doesn't sound like something that a serious car racer and car modding efficionado would say. And that's what he'd have to be if he could even consider beating that M3 in a GSX. If he was dumb enough to try racing some one without talking or signaling, bouncing off the limiter, etc. He deserved what he got. If you guys are confused at all about the power/weight differences, let me give you a quick summary:
M3 (stock) - 333hp 252 ft-lbs of torque 3415lbs
GSX (stock) - 210hp 214 ft-lbs of torque 3270lbs

If you do a quick mathematical equation, you'd find that the M3 has about 150lbs and 120hp MORE than the newest (1999) GSX's. Hence, no contest. Now say (in theory) if he was a heavy performance modder and got more HP out of his car, dont you think he'd have a bit more respect and knowledge for his car than obviously shown?

why are you comparing stock numbers???? we all know the gsx would lose if it were stock, but as stated like 3 or 4 times not, its stock, it was running a Green turbo with the necessary back up mods, a green will easily put an awd DSM into the mid to low 12's on conservative tune and deep 11's on more aggressive tune, stock M3's run 13.2's or so, so as far as that goes, the M3, if stock mind you, was toast and was totally outmatched as far as striaght line acceleration goes...mind you im not defending this kid, im defending that a car on that kinda setup will kick the shit out of basically 90% of cars it races on the street, and the M3 is included, i ran a turbo that was inferior to a green and pulled an M3 down with little trouble at all and not straining the boost, and in closing, heres what we've concluded...the M3 would not beat that particular GSX in any kind of straight line racing, roll or stop, the driver of the GSX should be shot and should immediately give me his $1300 turbo and deserved to blow his motor up for bouncing of rev limiter when racing a car he didn't even need to strain his car on to beat, and being a homosexual buttsex
__________________
Poppa J. Smurf

Last edited by PoppaSmurf; May 11, 2003 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #44 (permalink)  
PoppaSmurf's Avatar
Chowdah-head
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
Default

whoops, double post
__________________
Poppa J. Smurf
Reply
Old May 14, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #45 (permalink)  
Tripw0l's Avatar
The thirst mutilator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,810
Likes: 0
Default

when you come to the edit post page, there's a check box to delete your post....
__________________
"If I could write off your murder
I'd save all of my receipts
because I'd rather you be dead
than lose a tiny shred of what I made this fiscal year"
-Nathan Explosion (Brendon Small)
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #46 (permalink)  
cornishcrx's Avatar
gamehen
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Default

who cares who is faster? it was a fun video to watch.
__________________
1992 Civic stock k20 w/boost: 10.69@133 sold

NS Racing
Reply
Old May 15, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #47 (permalink)  
Laurentz's Avatar
TR Balla Donor Supreme
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Default

Originally posted by Kyle K
i'm suprised it wasnt the M3 that blew..
It's too bad you dont know what you're talking about.
__________________
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 03:37 AM
  #48 (permalink)  
SaturnTypeR's Avatar
Official Photo Ninja
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
Default

Gotta love quality camera work....
__________________

Official Photographer of Festivals of Speed St. Pete, Orlando, & Miami.

Canon 7D..Stepped up my Game
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #49 (permalink)  
dsm's Avatar
dsm
rice sleeper
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Default

well here u go kids, both vids before and aftermath, and the kid explains what he has in it. apparently he had something close to 450hp with a stock bottom end. heres his website: http://www.hawleycj.com/gsx/

and the link with the story http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...threadid=40430

enjoy
__________________
2010 Evo X MR
12.3@110mph
344whp/375wtq
Jalvarez Studio
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #50 (permalink)  
Young,Fablous,&Broke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,202
Likes: 0
Default

I am the only one who watched the video and thought the M3 wasnt even racing? Nor paying any attention to the kid?

Last edited by corey r.; May 21, 2003 at 03:39 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM.