The Video Post Check here for the latest videos!

Bad ass rx7

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:26 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
FDfranklin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Single Turbod!!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,398
Likes: 0
Default Bad ass rx7

YouTube - Bad Rx7
__________________


Car videos on my YouTube Channel (Subscribe please!):
http://www.youtube.com/user/FDfranklin
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:45 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Sneakin Deacon's Avatar
PSSHHH x2
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,291
Likes: 0
Default

neato. just sucks it didnt really make any more torque after 5000 or so. (guessing that was the rpm, hp/tq cross over at 5252 if the dyno charts increments are equal)

i am kind of dissappointed in the power he made with that turbo though, itll support almost 1000 or more to the wheels, but he was managing to run 25+psi and only making 670.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch

Yea, that about sums it up...

Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #3 (permalink)  
blacksti's Avatar
DudeMan
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 0
Default

i kept thinking batman was gonna pop out and do a battle when i the intro song was playing



amazing car though id kill for one of these
__________________
2jz mustang build
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/g...l-project.html




Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 03:45 AM
  #4 (permalink)  
97Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sneakin Deacon
neato. just sucks it didnt really make any more torque after 5000 or so. (guessing that was the rpm, hp/tq cross over at 5252 if the dyno charts increments are equal)

i am kind of dissappointed in the power he made with that turbo though, itll support almost 1000 or more to the wheels, but he was managing to run 25+psi and only making 670.
+1 rotaries just aren't built for torque. (which is why they spin the piss out of them)
wonder if it leaks?
and finally, it sounds like my dads old lawn mower, minus the turbo spool.
i'll respectfully pass.
__________________


Turdmaro is gone, boring dd Dodge for now.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 06:41 AM
  #5 (permalink)  
Sneakin Deacon's Avatar
PSSHHH x2
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,291
Likes: 0
Default

well, its hard to say they arent built for torque, horsepower is a derivative of torque, the reason the numbers are so off is that this thing spins to 9.5k so no, torque is not why they spin the piss out of them. horsepower is. this thing makes as much torque as a heads/cam LS1.

hp = (rpm*tq)/5252

tq = (hp*5252)/rpm

lets say it only made 350wtq but at 9500rpm, it still makes 633rwhp. whereas these numbers are dead even at 5252
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch

Yea, that about sums it up...

Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 07:22 AM
  #6 (permalink)  
VENOM 240s-R's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Default

its bad ass hell like it
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #7 (permalink)  
97Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sneakin Deacon
well, its hard to say they arent built for torque, horsepower is a derivative of torque, the reason the numbers are so off is that this thing spins to 9.5k so no, torque is not why they spin the piss out of them. horsepower is. this thing makes as much torque as a heads/cam LS1.

hp = (rpm*tq)/5252

tq = (hp*5252)/rpm

lets say it only made 350wtq but at 9500rpm, it still makes 633rwhp. whereas these numbers are dead even at 5252
Sorry i was a tad vague in my comments. I meant that they aren't necessarily the *best* or rather one of the better options for high torque applications. And my comment about spinning the piss out of them was based on the fact that, if you get any amount of weight spinning fast enough it's going to have torque.

Like the homemade toy with beer/soda bottle tops with 2 holes and string through it deal (or buttons for the sheltered kids lol) those weigh nothing at all but if you get'em spinning fast enough and try to grab it, they're hard to stop. No different than those things spooling up to some crazy rpm and dumping the clutch when they launch.
High RPM, high HP, and the proper gearing.

Anyhow, I'm not saying you're wrong, i was just clarifying my reasoning for my comments.
__________________


Turdmaro is gone, boring dd Dodge for now.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
Sneakin Deacon's Avatar
PSSHHH x2
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,291
Likes: 0
Default

...your making it sound like the heavier the rotating assembly, the more torque it will have.

torque is created by the energy made during combustion. rotating assemblies are balanced down to just a few grams, or should be anyways. there is no benefit from having an unbalanced/overweight rotating assembly.

what your talking about with the clutch dumping has to do with inertia. its already spinning and your trying to grab hold with the clutch. HP doesnt really play any part in that...a 40hp and a 4000hp engine can both spin 5000rpm with little load. now if there is alot of mass turning at 5000rpm then yes it will get you out with a bit more umph as there is more transference of energy, but the extra rotational mass isnt going to net you better power gains. it will take more power to turn it. usually rotational mass can be given a ratio of ~8:1 in comparison to regular mass (i.e. interior, seats, dash etc). this is why you may notice people gaining/losing up to 1.5-2 tenths in the 1/4 mile just by going to a new rim/tire combination
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch

Yea, that about sums it up...

Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 AM.