Mase / Stage6 built and tuned EVO VIII MR FQ-340
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,049
Likes: 0
the funny thing is though is that is supra is mild compared to most "fast" supras. that evo had almost every level of build going into the engine and it only managed to inch past the supra in the end. i willing to bet the bottom end on the supra is untouched as well.
__________________
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
Pretty nice build.
solid lifters, yuck, very noisy.
fuel cell. WHY? trunk size far more important.
magnus intake? did you research this?
wheres the cold air intake?
600whp? sure, but performance seems lacking. Unless those where pump gas pulls which I doubt. the famous 600whp AMS evo seemed a bit faster.
Nice car. well above average.
solid lifters, yuck, very noisy.
fuel cell. WHY? trunk size far more important.
magnus intake? did you research this?
wheres the cold air intake?
600whp? sure, but performance seems lacking. Unless those where pump gas pulls which I doubt. the famous 600whp AMS evo seemed a bit faster.
Nice car. well above average.
__________________
want a piece of the yellow car? (buy it)
you have to beat the blue car first
and then you have to take on the IV
my favorite quote
"if the solution is simple, God is answering"
want a piece of the yellow car? (buy it)
you have to beat the blue car first
and then you have to take on the IV
my favorite quote
"if the solution is simple, God is answering"
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Yes, they are loud, but knowing this car will be sitting at high rpms for long periods of time, its worth it, the noise isnt that big of a deal.
Thats your opinion. The owner would rather have an additional 80L of fuel capacity added to the stock fuel tank capacity. In my post, you should have noticed I mentioned the reason for the aux fuel tank. When you're racing across europe, it sure would be nice not to have to stop every 200 miles.
The car came over w/ the magnus. its not the 'best' design, but the rhd cars are more limited to what you can run.
Theres no need. Ive done testing of the IAT's with and without. No real difference.
Im not going to sit there and e-race about what car is faster. The car was built for pump gas. I just threw in race gas just to see what it can do.
As stated before my dyno dynamics reads about 15% less than a dynojet, and thats been proven. The numbers this car put down per pound of boost is awful impressive to say the least. I could have put a different fuel setup and jacked the boost up to 33-34 psi, and gotten way more power than 28 psi. Theres no need when the car will never need beyond a single walbro pump.
Those are the numbers on 93 octane.
Thats your opinion. The owner would rather have an additional 80L of fuel capacity added to the stock fuel tank capacity. In my post, you should have noticed I mentioned the reason for the aux fuel tank. When you're racing across europe, it sure would be nice not to have to stop every 200 miles.
The car came over w/ the magnus. its not the 'best' design, but the rhd cars are more limited to what you can run.
Theres no need. Ive done testing of the IAT's with and without. No real difference.
As stated before my dyno dynamics reads about 15% less than a dynojet, and thats been proven. The numbers this car put down per pound of boost is awful impressive to say the least. I could have put a different fuel setup and jacked the boost up to 33-34 psi, and gotten way more power than 28 psi. Theres no need when the car will never need beyond a single walbro pump.
Those are the numbers on 93 octane.
