Sick ass sounding S2000

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Feb 9, 2007 | 09:39 AM

#11 (permalink)

DD.

Administrator

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 14,978

Likes: 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by k2000

Oh my god, We had this old ass post alrdy....put it to rest damn

wow... Mr. 56 posts...

Well apparently he didnt see the post the first time or he wouldnt of posted it again.

Geez, fuk'n Noobs.

__________________

Feb 9, 2007 | 10:15 AM

#12 (permalink)

JDogg95

S13 Hatch

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

Loud....and slow.

__________________

Feb 9, 2007 | 10:36 AM

#13 (permalink)

Evangelion

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 973

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by REracer27

i have nothin againt s2k's, i love em and i would drive one but they're not quick at all... i beat one with a 75 dry shot when i was completly stock

You should beat them stock, without nitrous.

Feb 9, 2007 | 10:47 AM

#14 (permalink)

myltwon

Bolt-On 2v GT

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 8,713

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evangelion

You should beat them stock, without nitrous.

I think he meant the s2000 had a 75 shot

but yeah sounds decent and I've never seen it before so whatever

__________________

"Does this look like a piece of crap to you? Like them spinnin' tires do you?"

Feb 9, 2007 | 10:54 AM

#15 (permalink)

GRez

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,053

Likes: 0

hahahaha all that noise and it know go .......

Feb 9, 2007 | 11:48 AM

#16 (permalink)

REracer27

EatinLightning -SVT FTW!!

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 349

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evangelion

You should beat them stock, without nitrous.

s2k had 75 shot, not me....

__________________

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...endid=51433865

Feb 9, 2007 | 12:18 PM

#17 (permalink)

DD.

Administrator

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 14,978

Likes: 2

ooooo...i didnt realize they were that slow.

237hp@7800 And they dont weigh that much... and adding a 75 shot it still lost?

Something wrong with that.

__________________

Feb 9, 2007 | 12:54 PM

#18 (permalink)

67ChevelleSS

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,587

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by DareDevil

ooooo...i didnt realize they were that slow.

237hp@7800 And they dont weigh that much... and adding a 75 shot it still lost?

Something wrong with that.

Yeah it's the 14 ft. lbs. of torque they have

__________________
0-145 in 4.9 seconds
Shafiroff Racing Engines

Feb 9, 2007 | 01:09 PM

#19 (permalink)

REracer27

EatinLightning -SVT FTW!!

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 349

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by DareDevil

ooooo...i didnt realize they were that slow.

237hp@7800 And they dont weigh that much... and adding a 75 shot it still lost?

Something wrong with that.

it was a close race... and then again this was my first weekend racin my car. heres a video, i knew i had it some where.