that was the slowest race i have ever seen

 

wow just wow

 

I'm through explaining the truth to all you guys who are in denial. I had a friend with I/H/E with a tune, on an S2K, run a 11.8s in the quarter. You people are a joke, I can't believe you know nothing about these cars. I completely understand you can make any car fast with the right amount of money. I'm just saying an S2k is far better platform than a 4G63 equipped car to modify. If you look at the whole package, the F20C is a far better engine. It has 9000rpm rev limit, 240bhp, high compression, VTEC, and is a great sounding motor. The 4G63 just has a turbo, but that doesn't make it as fast as an S2k. Power to weight ratio people. The Eclipse/Talon weighs hundreds of pounds more than the S2K. For the guy who said you can't hit 13s stock, anybody can if they can drive. The S2K is a low 13s car from the factory. If you are not trapping above or around 100mph something is very wrong with your car. There must be some reason why we see more fast boosted S2Ks than turbo Eclipses. Coincidence? I think not.

 

i am buying an S2K in may, and i will still tell you you are full of shit. congratulations event horizon.

 

Damn K, You shouldnt have posted this video...But its the first time you ever got 33 replies...

 

Yeah your right ProRacer, Its crazy...All I wanted to do was post this video an hopefully get rep points or someshit, but all i got is n/a vs turbo in my thread...Its all good anyway, I'm just a car enthusiast that luvs his s2k

 

nah its because this troll is making stupid statements which are obviously said to get a reaction, and people take him seriously. blame him for ruining the thread.

 

 

If a I/H/full exhaust tuned S2K runs mid 11"s, I must be running 9"s...

 

...well i guess i could say the same thing if you count the times i didnt have the waste gate hooked up, but i think i hit fuel cut before 25psi.