Dodge Charger SRT-8 turbo

trev0006 · 2006-12-02 06:54:48

Dodge Charger SRT-8 turbo (http://www.dpccars.com/car-movies/12-02-06page-Dodge-Charger-SRT-8-turbo.htm)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Dec 1, 2006 | 09:54 PM

#1 (permalink)

trev0006

Thread Starter

Banned

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 671

Likes: 0

Dodge Charger SRT-8 turbo

Dodge Charger SRT-8 turbo

Dec 2, 2006 | 08:46 AM

#2 (permalink)

beebo10

Mazing

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 2,085

Likes: 0

still not impressive considering it does high 12's stock. im sure this car has alot more potential.

Dec 2, 2006 | 08:56 AM

#3 (permalink)

efficientkiller

Nurburgring Special

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 262

Likes: 0

not bad...i luv the SRT8 Charger

Dec 2, 2006 | 10:52 AM

#4 (permalink)

turbocuda

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by beebo10

still not impressive considering it does high 12's stock. im sure this car has alot more potential.

What do you mean not impressed...ran 11.76 at 123 mph....still appeared to have a few issues with launching and shifts seemed a little soft....That ain't no light rice mobile.

Dec 3, 2006 | 01:09 AM

#5 (permalink)

722ish

ASM FTW!

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 1,487

Likes: 0

The MPH is there it seems... those 6.1s are badass motors... i need one, now.

__________________
95 Supra Turbo 6 speed
11 SWP STI sedan

Dec 3, 2006 | 10:11 AM

#6 (permalink)

stealth cl

TeamSunWorks

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 721

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by XEventHorizonX

Wasn't turbo it was supercharged. If you listen it doesn't have a BOV. Pwned you newb, nice try. V8s with turbos,

. Leave the turbos where they belong, on Hondas.

wierd how even the announcer even says its turobcharged, you think your really going to hear the BOV when its facing away from you. and also wierd how some of the faster drag V8s are snailed...newb

think before you pretend to know

__________________
If sparks dont fly, your shits too high

Dec 3, 2006 | 11:01 AM

#7 (permalink)

beebo10

Mazing

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 2,085

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbocuda

What do you mean not impressed...ran 11.76 at 123 mph....still appeared to have a few issues with launching and shifts seemed a little soft....That ain't no light rice mobile.

well now a days 11.76 is not a big deal. take a stock c6 with less power, supercharge it and some slicks and ur in the 10's. or the gt500 in the 9's. maybe it was just a bad driver, but that car should be in the 10's easy.

Dec 3, 2006 | 03:58 PM

#8 (permalink)

N75T'rex

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 378

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbocuda

What do you mean not impressed...ran 11.76 at 123 mph....still appeared to have a few issues with launching and shifts seemed a little soft....That ain't no light rice mobile.

Ain't no light rice mobile hahaha lol

nice 5th grader come back** you must think every thing that has a honda symbol is slow too bad you didnt run in to me

__________________

http://www.prostreetimport.com

"Take her once if shes easy, Take her twice"
*"Those Who Are Driven Have Nothing To Prove"*
"("Qoute" Paul @JCR)" "There Are No Cheap Builds That are Reliable,.But Yet Fast As Hell. There Called Competition Motors They Only Got 10 passes left LOL!!")
Official TR IMV-FTC Member#01
M*A*S*H Hater #001 L0L

Dec 3, 2006 | 04:19 PM

#9 (permalink)

turbocuda

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

The charger is more of a cruiser than the performane bred vette!!
So 11 sec 120+ mph 1/4 is pretty decent for a 4000+ lb land yacht....
If anyone can't tell it is turboed over charged then some people shouldn't post.....Oh I don't think I would have any problem running into most anyone in this forum.....

408 ci sbm twin 61mm p-trims