Thread: Turbo or N/A ??
View Single Post
Old Nov 28, 2003 | 08:44 AM
  #22 (permalink)  
TheShow50h's Avatar
TheShow50h
The little 5.0 that could
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,275
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by NitroGlycerin
I agree... Assuming you're talking about built engines, they're fairly rare.

Anywho, if it were me, I would rather have a quicker car than a bracket race contender.

Turbo

-Mike
Excellent point guys. I have a built stang with 3.73s and exhaust

If your escort when turbo'd can run sub 9 second passes at sunshine with less than a few hundred $ in work, then I'll agree that it will be cheaper, but my insurance is 1700 a year (19 y/o, 5.0, 1 wreck 1 ticket). Probably 25mpg on the highway with 3.73s, with the 2.73s I had before it was a highway machine though Probably lookin at 30 with the 2.73s I had.

Hardly anyone has a Built mustang that is daily driven. (I'd consider very low 12s and less built.)
Reply