Old Nov 15, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
sxysweed's Avatar
sxysweed
CRX.XXX
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHondaRider
step design, no idea what the increase would be needed. I would assume the easiest piping size to get is the next size up. Like a 1.5" tube then a 2" in the bends? Hopefully someone has the answer because it would be nice to know.
Not a step design. Step design is where you go from say 1.5" to 1.75" to 2.0" pipe in the header(s). If you take a 1.5" pipe and bend it using a mandrel, the inside may or may not still be 1.5" in the bend, but for the gas passing through it, the pipe will 'act' like it's smaller than 1.5". I don't know a better way to describe it, but a bent pipe that's 1.5" ID is smaller than a pipe of 1.5" to the gases passing through it.

0.5" is a bit of a jump in size though.

I was asking because I want to design a 4-1 header that has ~40" long primaries (1-5/8" ID) heading into a custom collector that chokes down to 1-5/8" then has a cone expanding up to 2.5". But there will have to be atleast two 45* bends, and if I do them in the same 1-5/8" ID as the rest of the header, they'll be more like 1-3/5" (made up number) because it's a curved pipe.

Hope that makes sense.

I asked this on a few forums, and the answer I got is not to worry about stepping up the diameter in the bends (beauty of mandrel bends, ID stays the same). Kinda found the answer to my own question.

Last edited by sxysweed; Nov 15, 2010 at 07:59 PM.
Reply