Originally Posted by
8600RPM
In most cases involving prints smaller than your average movie poster, you cant see the difference in image quality with a Hassy vs. a pro level DSLR.
I have a friend that shoots an older Hassy with a digital back, and his prints arent anything to write home to momma about when we use the same company for print work.
Thanks for your post. But I make what i thought was an obvious joke about the camera, and you take it serious.
Im no rookie sir, so i am well aware of the effect the camera has on the quality of prints.
Originally Posted by
modz365
LOL... It probably is...
Thank you for playing along.
Originally Posted by
Cola
In a way it is implying that the photographer did nothing but own an expensive piece of equipment an press a button without realizing there is much more to it than that.
Yourself, and every other photographer has to agree, that the camera is a big contributing factor to taking good pictures. Although, i believe now, more then ever, post processing is bigger.
With lightroom and photoshop, a point and shoot photo can compare to a photo taken by a DSLR. Is he/she a good photographer? In most cases, no. Is he/she a good editor? Most likely.