View Single Post
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #103 (permalink)  
1BADP71's Avatar
1BADP71
E & I Certified
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,185
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Superluminal
You obviously have no idea or experience on turbocharged vehicles. Did you miss the part where I said "stock turbo". Just because it's running 15psi, doesn't mean it's going to pull like a Supra. The efficiency of a small stock turbocharger isn't going to net huge power gains. The car in the video is probably putting out less than 200whp. Once the turbocharger is upgraded to a larger unit, it becomes much more efficient at the same boost level, which in turn will net you more power.

Also keep in mind all stock turbos are not equal, some are larger than others, which in turn, helps to car do better in performance. For instance an SR20DET, that comes with a T25G will only net about 240whp at 14psi. That's only good for low 13s, and that's the cap for the stock turbo. Other cars, such as a STI, EVO, SRT-4, and MazdaSpeed 3, come with a larger and more efficient turbo from the factory, so you can crank the boost up to 22psi and get the car into the 12s easily.

It appears you're having problems putting things into context. This car was released in 1984 and it was faster than the Mustang 5.0 at the time. Other than a handful of sports cars, there wasn't much, if anything, that could compete against it in its category.

On the contrary, when the H22 came out for the Prelude, it was considered average. By this time there were many sports cars in the low 14s and in the 13s stock. So at the time, it wasn't really impressive. Today, a Dodge Omni GLH is considered average performance, but back in 1984.... it was fast for what is was.
Thanks for the "schoolin" on turbos but I have driven, built, and owned turbo vehicles before. none of which were hack jobs either. You missed my point completely when I said I knew of a Heavier car, with ALSO a stock turbo and smaller engine (1993 2.0 vs your 1984 2.2), putting out only 1 psi more, doing .7 better in the 1/4 .. hence the reason I said the omni in your video was slow. even with no bumpers.

Stating that your video'd car has less than 200 hp .. that sure is a mean street sleeper , and the prelude is in no way considered a sports car. but when it came with 100 hp per liter n/a and equipped with an lsd .. well that was just honda doing their thing.


here is a link to the cars you are trying to describe to me. if you want to read up on them a little more before you post again.

The Dodge Omni GLH, Dodge Omni GLHS, and Dodge Charger GLH-S

Last edited by 1BADP71; Jun 12, 2009 at 10:34 AM.
Reply