View Single Post
Old Jun 11, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
95coBraSVT's Avatar
95coBraSVT
banana republic
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,819
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by red vert
straight from the link, and if I wasn't lazy i'd find the rest.

The bill would direct dealers to ensure that the older vehicles are crushed or shredded to get the clunkers off the road. It was intended to help replace older vehicles — built in model year 1984 or later — and would not make financial sense for consumers owning an older car with a trade-in value greater than $3,500 or $4,500.
Yeeeessss......and, like I said, please read the entire thing....Here is a quote from it also:
A group of senators led by California Democrat Dianne Feinstein were pushing an alternative version that would require consumers to trade up for more fuel-efficient cars and trucks to qualify. They complained that even a 2009 Hummer H3T, which gets 14 mpg in city driving and 18 mpg on the highway, could qualify for the incentives under the House bill.
A 2009 vehicle...a "clunker" under this bill.
__________________



Originally Posted by rotarykidd
maybe i just like rainbows and puke, who says it has to be a gay thing?
Reply